The
Impact of HAART
on Treatment
of HIV-HCV and
HIV-HBV Coinfection By
Marina Nunez,
MD, PhD Effect
of HAART on
ESLD-free Survival Several
reports suggest
that the use
of HAART counterbalances
the negative
impact of HIV
infection on
the course and
outcome of HCV
coinfection.
In a study presented
at the 13th
CROI, the effect
of HAART on
progression
to end-stage-liver-disease
(ESLD) was evaluated
in a cohort
of hemophiliacs
with known dates
of HIV and HCV
seroconversion,
HAART use, and
clinical outcomes
[1].
ESLD
developed in
17 out of 85
(20%) HIV-positive
and in 8 of
72 (11.1%) HIV-negative
patients.
Median ESLD-free
survival was
significantly
shorter in HIV-positive
than in non-HIV
patients [hazard
ratio, HR, 3.00
(95% CI 1.27-7.08);
p=0.009]. With
each decade
of HIV infection,
ESLD risk increased
1.63-fold (95%
CI 1.14-2.35;
p=0.008). ESLD-free
survival was
significantly
longer among
HAART-treated
HIV+ (30.3 years)
than in non-HAART
HIV+ subjects
(20 years) [HR
3.14 (95% CI
1.27-7.08);
p=0.043], but
was similar
to that in non-HIV
men. In like
manner, HCV
duration, age
at death or
present, median
age at ESLD,
overall
mortality and
ESLD mortality
were similar
in HAART-treated
and HIV-negative
patients. These
findings suggest
that HAART slows
progression
of HCV-related
liver disease
to ESLD and
results in decreased
mortality. Nevertheless,
the care of
HIV-HCV coinfected
patients should
also contemplate
the provision
of specific
anti-HCV
drugs
in addition
to HAART in
an attempt to
eradicate the
HCV infection
in these patients. The
Role of HAART
in Liver Enzyme
Elevation The
negative effects
of HAART on
HIV-hepatitis
virus-coinfected
patients was
the subject
of a few studies
presented at
CROI 2006. The
line between
elevation of
liver
enzymes
due to HAART
toxicity and
to the hepatitis
coinfections
(HCV and HBV)
themselves is
not clear. Italian
investigators
addressed this
issue analyzing
the I.Co.N.A.
cohort
[2]. HIV-infected
patients with
HCV-coinfection,
defined by positive
anti-HCV antibody,
and/or with
HBV-coinfection,
defined by positive
HBsAg,
were examined.
HAART was prescribed
to 1,547 patients,
while 937 others
remained antiretroviral
naïve. Non-coinfected
patients (2,547)
were also included
in the analyses.
There
was no evidence
that HAART was
differently
used in coinfected
and HIV monoinfected
patients, after
adjustment by
age, sex, HIV
risk factor
and baseline
ALT. Liver enzyme
elevations were
detected in
618 occasions
in 353 patients.
Patients on
HAART were not
at increased
risk for liver
enzyme elevations
[RR 1.13 (95%
CI 0.89-1.43);
p=0.28]. The
occurrence of
liver enzyme
elevations was
significantly
more frequent
in intravenous
drug users [RR
1.56 versus
heterosexuals
(95% CI 1.03-2.36);
p=0.03]. The
authors concluded,
“Most of liver
enzyme elevations
observed during
HAART in hepatitis
viruses coinfected
patients are
probably related
to the natural
history of liver
disease and
not to direct
drug
hepatotoxicity.”
These results
challenge the
concept of HAART
hepatotoxicity
in HIV-hepatitis
coinfected
patients. Nevertheless,
the analysis
could be further
refined by a
stronger definition
of HCV coinfection
and by taking
into account
the effect of
anti-HBV
active drugs
as part of HAART
in the case
of HBV
coinfection. HAART
Duration and
Outcome in HIV,
HIV-HBV and
HIV-HCV Coinfection
The
duration of
first-line antiretroviral
regimen may
be decreased
in HIV-hepatitis
coinfected patients
due to the development
of HAART-related
liver toxicity.
Canadian authors
presented the
results of a
study in which
526 HIV-only,
173 HIV/HCV-,
and 30 HIV/HBV-coinfected
subjects receiving
HAART for the
first time between
January 2000
and December
2004 were evaluated
[3].
The
overall median
duration of
therapy was
14months. Those
with HCV- coinfection
had shorter
duration of
therapy (HCV
9 months) than
those with HIV
monoinfection
(17 months)
(p<0.001).
In univariate
analysis, longer
HAART duration
was predicted
by HIV-monoinfection
versus HCV coinfection
[OR 1.64 (95%
CI 1.35-1.99);
p<0.001].
However, in
multivariate
Cox regression
analysis, history
of injection
drug use (OR
1.59; p<0.001)
but no HCV-coinfection
(OR 1.19; p=0.19)
predicted shorter
duration of
first HAART.
Poor
adherence and
substance abuse
were major explanations
for premature
interruptions
in HIV/HCV-coinfected
subjects in
this study. 02/21/06 References 1.
R Schillo
and others.
HAART improves
ESLD-free survival
in HIV/HCV coinfection.
13th
Conference on
Retroviruses
and Opportunistic
Infections.
February
5-8, 2006, Denver,
CO
Abstract 886. 2.
P Cicconi
and others.
Is the increased
risk of liver
enzyme elevation
in hepatitis
coinfected
patients greater
in those on
HAART than in
antiretroviral
naïve patients?
13th
Conference on
Retroviruses
and Opportunistic
Infections.
February
5-8, 2006, Denver,
CO. Abstract
888. 3.
C L Cooper and
others. Comparison
of first ART
duration and
outcome in HIV,
HIV/HBV, and
HIV/HCV infection.
13th
Conference on
Retroviruses
and Opportunistic
Infections.
February
5-8, 2006, Denver,
CO. Abstract
890.
|