In Nonresponders to Peginterferon/Ribavirin, Valopicitabine Plus Peginterferon at Optimal Dosing Produces Significantly Greater HCV Suppression Compared to Retreatment with Peginterferon Alfa
HCV genotype 1 non-responders (NR) to pegIFN/RBV comprise over 50% of currently treated patients and have no proven treatment options. NM283 has shown anti-HCV activity alone and in combination with pegIFN in Phase I-IIa trials, without viral breakthrough for study periods up to 6 months.
This ongoing Phase IIb trial is comparing 5 treatments in NR patients with HCV-genotype 1, whose HCV RNA never became PCR-negative with ≥12 weeks of pegIFN/RBV.
All patients had HCV RNA ≥5 log10 IU/mL by TaqMan PCR, ALT<5xULN, and compensated disease. Patients were randomized 1:2:2:2:2 among 5 treatments: NM283 monotherapy (800 mg/d), 3 combination (comboRx) arms with different NM283 dosing (400 mg/d; 800 mg/d; or dose-ramping 400 to 800 mg/d) +pegIFN, or pegIFN/RBV retreatment as control.
PegIFNa-2a (Pegasys) is dosed at 180 mg SQ/week with weight-based RBV (1000-1200 mg daily). Virologic response criteria are stipulated for week 4 (≥0.5 log reduction), week 12 (³1.0 log), and week 24 (≥2.0 log); patients who fail these criteria are designated treatment failures and discontinue.
Results
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) results for the 162 patients who have reached week 24, including dropouts and failures by LOCF conventions:
|
Response at 24 Weeks |
Treatment Group |
N |
Mean ¯ HCV RNA
(log10 IU/mL) |
Median ¯ HCV (log10 IU/mL) |
1 PegIFN + RBV control |
31 |
2.31 |
1.21 |
2 NM283 400 + pegIFN |
40 |
2.49 |
2.31 |
3 NM283 400-800 ramp + pegIFN |
38 |
3.01* |
3.05 |
4 NM283 800 + pegIFN |
32 |
3.32* |
3.29 |
5 NM283 monoRx |
21 |
0.54 |
0.42 |
*p<0.03 pooled 800+peg-IFN vs peg-IFN |
HCV RNA responses in the 2 higher-dose NM283+pegIFN comboRx arms are significantly greater vs pegIFN/RBV retreatment. By comparison to other Phase IIb data, early HCV RNA reductions are substantially greater in HCV-1 treatment-naïve patients with similar NM283/pegIFN regimens, confirming the difficulty in suppressing HCV in NR patients. No viral breakthrough has been seen to date.
In conclusion, the authors write, “In non-responders to pegIFN/RBV, valopicitabine + pegIFN treatment at optimal dosing produces significantly greater HCV suppression compared to pegIFN/RBV retreatment, with antiviral efficacy proportional to valopicitabine dose.”
“Continued treatment will determine if these encouraging viral responses at 24 weeks will result in viral clearance and SVR.”
05/26/06
Reference
Paul Pockros, Christopher O’Brien, Eliot Godofsky, and others. Valopicitabine (NM283), Alone or with Peg-Interferon, Compared to Peg Interferon/Ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) Retreatment in Hepatitis C Patients with Prior Non-Response to PegIFN/RBV: Week 24 Results. Abstract 4 (Presidential Plenary 1). DDW 2006. May 20-25, 2006. Los Angeles, CA.
|