Cost
Effectiveness of Hepatitis B Treatment with Antiviral Agents Cost
is in issue when considering treatment
for hepatitis B. Many patients receive initial therapy with lamivudine
(Epivir-HBV), in part because this agent is less expensive than the more recently
approved adefovir (Hepsera) and
entecavir (Baraclude).
However,
a study presented at the recent Digestive Disease Week 2006 conference in Los
Angeles showed that treatment with entecavir is cost-effective compared with either
lamivudine or adefovir. Both HBeAg seroconversion
and HBV DNA suppression were markers
for treatment success. This
study used a mathematical model to assess the impact of HBV viral load on disease
progression. The model included 14 distinct health states, which were used to
track clinical outcomes such as HBeAg and HBsAg seroconversion, drug resistance,
disease progression, and death. Patients who developed drug resistance were switched
to different agents. Estimated risk of cirrhosis based on HBV viral load level
was derived from the REVEAL-HBV study, a population-based prospective cohort trial
that included 3582 untreated hepatitis B patients. Results  | Assessment
of patients who did not experience HBeAg seroconversion but achieved undetectable
HBV DNA during therapy (48% with entecavir, 20% with lamivudine, and 9% with adefovir
after one year) increased the difference in life expectancy from 0.54 to 0.79
years per patient, compared with seroconversion only. |  | Total
healthcare costs decreased from $3574 to $3245, and the incremental cost-effectiveness
ratio (ICER) decreased from $10,911 to $7264 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
|  | An
analysis of two-year entecavir vs adefovir treatment showed an increase in the
difference in life expectancy from 0.16 to 0.43 years, and a decrease in the ICER
from $10,474 per QALY to $3050 per QALY. |  | In
a projected analysis of four-year entecavir vs lamivudine treatment, the difference
in life expectancy increased from 0.84 to 1.56 years, and the ICER was $4214 per
QALY. |
|
Conclusion The
researchers concluded that entecavir is cost-effective as compared with either
lamivudine or adefovir, and that "both seroconversion and complete viral
suppression have an important impact on the long-term outcomes of HBV anti-viral
therapy." 6/09/06 Reference DL
Veenstra, UH Iloeje, E. Tafesse, and others. Cost-effectiveness of antivirals
in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: impact of seroconversion and viral suppression.
Abstract T1848. Digestive Disease Week 2006. May 20-25, 2006. Los Angeles, California. 

|