Tenofovir Plus Trizivir Effective in a Subset of Treatment-experienced Patients

In order to simplify antiretroviral therapy and avoid side effects and long-term toxicities associated with protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), researchers have conducted several studies of regimens that contain only nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).

Past studies have shown that NRTI-only regimens are less potent overall that PI- or NNRTI-based regimens, but may be suitable for certain patients such as those with low baseline viral loads.

At the 8th Annual International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection (HIV8) held last week in Glasgow, researchers presented data from a 48-week study of 122 treatment-experienced patients taking a single-class regimen consisting of tenofovir DF (Viread) plus the AZT/3TC/abacavir fixed-dose combination pill (Trizivir).

Of the 122 subjects, 35 were initially on Trizivir alone, and tenofovir was added to intensify the regimen. Others had achieved virological suppression on other regimens, but switched to the NRTI-only combination due to toxicity.

Results

At baseline, participants had a median viral load of 406 copies/mL and a median CD4 cell count of 281 cells/mm3.

In an intent-to-treat analysis at Week 48, the median viral load was 78 copies/mL and the median CD4 count was 321 cells/mm3.

80 patients (66%) achieved virological response.

These included 11 out of 27 subjects with HIV RNA above 100,000 copies/mL at baseline.

Only 3 patients experienced virological failure after Week 24.

For the 80 patients who remained on therapy, viral load continued to drop after Week 24, to a sustained suppression below 50 copies/mL, and CD4 count rose to 402 cells/mm3.

24 of the 35 patients failing Trizivir alone responded to Trizivir plus tenofovir.

54 of 61 patients who switched to Trizivir plus tenofovir due to toxicity (baseline viral load 400 copies/mL or less) experienced stable or improved virological suppression.

Significant predictors of virological response were:
- baseline viral load below 5000 copies/mL (P < 0.001);
- baseline CD4 count of 200 cells/mm3 or greater (P < 0.001).

Among the 85 subjects for whom genotypic resistance results were available, the only predictor of virological failure was the 41L+210W+215Y/F mutational pattern (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

"Patients on a failing NRTI-only regimen showed virologic response after tenofovir intensification," the researchers concluded. "Patients who failed virologically did so early. Baseline viral load < 5000 copies was a significant predictor for response. Mono-class tenofovir plus Trizivir therapy showed increasing efficacy even after 24 weeks, which was maintained out to 48 weeks."

11/21/06

Reference
B Dauer, P Khaykin, P Gute, and others. Response to mono-class nucleoside regimen of tenofovir DF + trizivir in antiretroviral-experienced patients: 48 week results and predictors of response. 8th Annual International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection. Glasgow, UK. November 12-16, 2006. Abstract P27.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Conference
Main Page


FDA-Approved
HIV and AIDS Treatments

Protease Inhibitors
Agenerase
Aptivus
Crixivan
Fortovase
Invirase
Kaletra
Lexiva

Norvir
Prezista

Reyataz
Viracept


Nucleoside / Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Combivir
Epivir
Emtriva
Epzicom
Hivid
Retrovir
Trizivir
Truvada  
Videx
Viread
Zerit
Ziagen


non Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Rescriptor

Sustiva
Viramune

Entry Inhibitors
Fuzeon

Fixed-dose Combinations
Atripla
Combivir
Trizivir
Truvada