At the 46th
Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, taking place
this week in San Francisco, researchers presented 96-week data on virological
responses in the 2 studies.
Study
participants had prior experience with at least 3 classes of antiretroviral drugs
(including at least 2 PI-based regimens) and had at least 1 primary PI-resistance
mutation. Patients were randomized to receive 500/200 mg tipranavir/ritonavir
or a comparator PI plus an optimized background regimen (OBR). Treatment response
rates, time to treatment failure, and virological response rates (below 400 and
below 50 copies/mL) were determined.
Results
1483 patients were randomized: 746 to tipranavir/ritonavir and 737 to comparator
PIs.
20%
of participants also took enfuvirtide (T-20;
Fuzeon).
In an intent-to-treat analysis at Week 96, treatment response (viral load reduction
of at least 1 log) rates were 26.7% in the tipranavir/ritonavir arm and 10.4%
in the comparator PI arm (P < 0.0001).
26.9% of patients achieved viral loads below 400 copies/mL in the tipranavir/ritonavir
arm, compared with 10.7% in the comparator PI arm.
The corresponding percentages achieving HIV RNA below 50 copies/mL were 20.4%
(tipranavir/ritonavir) and 9.0% (comparator PI) (P < 0.0001).
In patients taking enfuvirtide, proportions of patients with viral load below
400 and below 50 copies/mL for were 38.2% and 28.8% in the tipranavir/ritonavir
arm, compared with 14.1% and 12.6% for comparator PIs (P </= 0.0002).
The median time to treatment failure was 115 days in the tipranavir/ritonavir
arm and 0 days in the comparator PI arm (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion
According
to the researchers, these results confirm the durable superiority of tipranavir/ritonavir
versus comparator PI regimens in highly treatment-experienced patients. "Tipranavir/ritonavir
plus OBR was significantly better than comparator PI/ritonavir in achieving Week
96 treatment and virologic responses and delaying treatment failure," they
wrote. "Combining tipranavir/ritonavir with another active agent resulted
in a greater rate of virologic response in this population."
AIDS
Healthcare Foundation, Los Angeles, CA; Dupont Circle Physicians Group, Washington,
DC; Duke Univ. Med. Ctr., Durham, SC; Royal Free Hospital, London, U.K.; Università
Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Fundación Huesped, Buenos Aires,
Argentina.