Highly
Sensitive HCV RNA Tests Required to Evaluate Treatment Response and Relapse Rates
and to Create Individualized Treatment Strategies for Hepatitis C Patients In
order to improve individualized therapeutic strategies for patients with HCV
infection, it is important to determine the most precise estimation possible
of early virological response rates (EVR). The sensitive TMA test may be the best
tool currently available to distinguish sustained from non-sustained responders
(i.e., relapsers) at early stages of treatment. In
the current study, presented at the recent 58th Annual Meeting of the American
Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD 2007) in Boston (November 2-6,
2007), German researchers evaluated whether TMA might be a better indicator to
predict long-term outcome of anti-HCV therapy in genotype 1 patients who have
undetectable HCV RNA according to the branched DNA (bDNA) assay. In
this 48-week study, 433 participants were randomized to receive either 1.5 mcg/kg
pegylated
interferon alfa-2b (PegIntron) plus 800-1400 mg ribavirin for 48 weeks (n=225,
group A) or an individualized treatment duration (n=208, group B). In
the latter group, treatment duration was calculated based on the time required
to become HCV RNA negative for the first time as defined by the bDNA assay (limit
of detection 615 IU/mL) multiplied by a factor 6. HCV
RNA levels were quantified weekly until week 8, then at weeks 12 and 24. The more
sensitive TMA test (limit of detection 5.3 IU/mL) was also prospectively assessed
for all patients who were HCV RNA negative by bDNA. The different response groups
were classified according to HCV RNA levels at weeks 4 and 12. Results
The
table shows the relevant data and refers to the relative relapse rates in group
A and B at weeks 4 and 12 in relation to treatment schedule.
There
is clear evidence for a high relapse rate in patients with a positive TMA, being
more pronounced within the first 12 weeks of therapy when treatment duration was
shortened in the individualized treatment group.
In
contrast, patients who responded as early as week 4 as evidenced by a negative
TMA test had relapse rates below 10% regardless of treatment group.
|
Response Groups |
Relative Relapse Rate (%) |
|
Week 4 response |
≥ log decline, bDNA positive |
36% (all patients) |
19% (group A) |
63% (group B) |
|
bDNA negative, TMA positive |
38% (all patients) |
22% (group A) |
49% (group B) |
|
bDNA negative, TMA negative |
4% (all patients) |
0% (group A) |
8% (group B) |
|
Week 12 response |
≥ 2 log decline, bDNA positive |
77% (all patients) |
78% (group A) |
75% (group B) |
|
bDNA negative, TMA positive |
64% (all patients) |
56% (group A) |
69% (group B) |
|
bDNA negative, TMA negative |
20% (all patients) |
9% (group A) |
32% (group B) |
Based of these
findings, the researchers concluded, "The application of the highly sensitive
HCV RNA tests must be considered to be mandatory now because this new test helps
to evaluate in a much more refined way treatment response as well as relapse rates
and provides better clues for an individualized tailored treatment strategy." "Our
study clearly indicates that patients, even with a minimal amount of HCV RNA detected
at week 12, can suffer from relapse rates greater than 50%," they continued.
"These patients may indeed benefit when their treatment duration is adapted
to their individual needs." Charite,
Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; Medizinische Universitätsklinik,
Frankfurt, Germany; Klinikum der Universität Würzburg, Würzburg,
Germany; Hepatologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Berlin, Germany; Medizinische Universitätsklinik,
Freiburg, Germany; Christian-Albrecht-Universität, Kiel, Germany; Universitätsklinik,
Zürich, Switzerland; Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Bonn, Germany;
Universitätsklinik Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Essex GmbH, München,
German. 11/09/07 Reference
T Berg, V
Weich, G Teuber, and others. Importance of a Minimal Residual Viremia for the
Relapse Prediction in HCV Type 1 Patients Receiving Standard or Individualized
Treatment Duration. 58th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study
of Liver Diseases (AASLD 2007). Boston, MA. November 2-6, 2007. Abstract (oral)
179.
|