HIV and Hepatitis.com Coverage of the
14th Annual Conference on Retroviruses
and Opportunistic Infections (14th CROI)

February 25 - 28, 2007, Los Angeles, CA

U.S. Studies Show 10%-15% of Newly-diagnosed Individuals Have Drug-resistant HIV

By Liz Highleyman

It is well known that suboptimal or prolonged antiretroviral therapy can lead to the emergence of drug-resistant HIV. But resistance is also a growing problem among newly infected individuals who have never received antiretroviral agents themselves, presumably because they acquire virus that has already developed drug-resistance mutations.

Several studies reported at the 14th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections this past February aimed to determine the incidence of drug-resistant HIV in newly diagnosed individuals.

11 U.S. States

In the largest study, W. Wheeler and colleagues used data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Variant, Atypical, and Resistant HIV Surveillance system (VARHS), analyzing blood specimens from more than 3000 newly diagnosed treatment-naive individuals who underwent confidential HIV testing at 409 sites (e.g., HIV test sites, sexually transmitted disease [STD] clinics, private physicians, hospitals) in 11 states between January 2003 and October 2006.

The investigators identified major antiretroviral drug resistance mutations categorized according to International AIDS Society guidelines and derived HIV subtypes using the Stanford online HIV Drug Resistance Database.

Results

  • Based on 3130 analyzed specimens, 327 individuals (10.4%) showed evidence of drug-resistance mutations.
  • In various participating states, rates ranged from 6.3% to 13.0%.
  • Looking at specific drug classes, the resistance rates were:
    • non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs): 217 subjects (6.9%);
    • nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs): 111 subjects (3.6%);
    • protease inhibitors (PIs): 75 subjects (2.4%).
  • 60 individuals (1.9%) showed evidence of multiple drug-resistance mutations:
    • 44 subjects (1.4%) had mutations conferring resistance to at least 1 agent in 2 classes;
    • 16 subjects (0.5%) had resistance to drugs in all 3 major antiretroviral drug classes.

The researchers concluded that these findings -- based on the largest and most diverse U.S. population-based sample to date -- have implications for initial treatment of newly diagnosed individuals. “These findings also emphasize the importance of ongoing molecular HIV surveillance in the United States,” they said.

Northrop Grumman Corp, Atlanta, GA; CDC, Atlanta, GA.

Link to PDF of poster

Link to study abstract

 

San Francisco

In another study, N. Zetola and colleagues analyzed the presence of drug-resistant HIV among 402 newly diagnosed individuals in San Francisco between 2004 and 2006. This analysis included subjects tested at HIV test sites and STD clinics, as well as a cohort of participants in a study of acute HIV infection.  

Results 

55 of the 402 tested subjects (13.7%) had evidence of drug-resistant HIV:

NNRTI resistance was most common, at 9.5%;

About 3% had multidrug resistance, including 0.7% with 3-class resistance.

The investigators concluded that, "Transmitted drug resistance was modest in frequency and not increasing in newly identified HIV cases in San Francisco."

In fact, contrary to some past reports, this study found that the prevalence of drug-resistant HIV among newly diagnosed individuals actually declined between 2005 and 2006.

Univ of California at San Francisco; San Francisco Dept of Public Health; Gladstone Inst of Virology and Immunology; AIDS Health Project, San Francisco, CA.

Link to study abstract

New York City

A. Low and colleagues looked at rates of drug resistance in 108 individuals with acute or recently acquired HIV infection, diagnosed between January 2005 and December 2006 in New York City.

Results

The overall rate of resistant HIV was 12.8%.

The rate of NNRTI resistance was 9.3%.

The rate of multidrug resistance was 4.6%.

Rates of drug resistance declined significantly compared with a similar survey conducted in 2003-2004, in which the overall resistance rate (27.1%) and the multidrug resistance rate (4.6%) were more than twice as high.

However, the rate of NNRTI resistance remained comparable
The researchers concluded that, "The transmission of drug-resistant virus in this homogenous cohort is trending downward, possibly due to better adherence to current regimens in the local HIV-1-infected population."

Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Ctr, Rockefeller Univ, New York, NY.

Link to study abstract

Spain

Finally, a study by C. de Mendoza and colleagues looked at rates of transmitted drug resistance in Spain. This study included about 350 consecutive recent HIV seroconverters (12 months or less since exposure) seen between January 1997 and September 2006 at 15 hospitals across the country.

Results

Overall, 14.7% showed evidence of antiretroviral resistance mutations in the most recent study period (2005-2006).

Resistance to NNRTIs was most common (about 10%), followed by NRTIs (about 4.5%), then PIs (about 3.5%).

Resistance was most common in 1997-1999 (29%), then declined significantly in 2000-2001 (5.3%).

However, the rate of resistance then began to rise again, reaching 10.7% in 2002-2004 and 14.7% in 2005-2006.

A significant proportion…of recent HIV-1 seroconverters in 2005-2006 harbor drug-resistance mutations, which represents an increase with respect to prior years,” the investigators concluded. “Moreover, PI-resistant and multidrug-resistant viruses have become more frequent in recent years.”

Hosp Carlos III, Madrid; Ctr Sanitario Sandoval, Madrid; Hosp Gen, Elche; Hosp Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona; Hosp de la Ribera, Valencia; Hosp Xeral, Santiago; Hosp Marques de Valdecilla, Santander; Hosp Gen, Valencia; Hosp Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain.

Link to study abstract

Conclusion

Taken together, these studies all found rates of transmitted drug resistance between 10% and 15%. There was some indication that this may be decreasing, especially in the U.S., perhaps due to more effective antiretroviral therapies and better adherence.Nevertheless, the prevalence of drug-resistant HIV remains a concern, and suggests that newly diagnosed individuals should undergo resistance testing before starting treatment, as recommended by the most recent DHHS treatment guidelines.


04/06/07

References

W Wheeler, K Mahle, Ulana Bodnar (U.S. Variant, Atypical and Resistant HIV Surveillance Group). Antiretroviral Drug-resistance Mutations and Subtypes in Drug-naïve Persons Newly Diagnosed with HIV-1 Infection, US, March 2003 to October 2006. 14th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI). Los Angeles, February 25-28, 2007. Abstract 648 (poster).

N Zetola, K Ahrens, C Kent, and others. Surveillance for Transmitted Drug-resistance in Sentinel-sites: San Francisco, 2005-2006. 14th CROI. Abstract 652 (poster).

A Low, H Mohri, M Markowitz. Recent Trends in Transmitted Drug Resistance in a New York City Cohort. 14th CROI. Abstract 651 (poster).

C de Mendoza, C Rodriguez, F Gutierrez, and others. Transmission of HIV Strains with Resistance to PI and to Multiple Drug Classes Is Growing in Spain. 14th CROI. Abstract 656 (poster).












































14th croi