Impact
of Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption among HIV-HCV and HIV-HBV Coinfected
Patients in the SMART Trial
By
Liz Highleyman Liver
disease related to coinfection with hepatitis B
or hepatitis C virus (HBV or HCV) is an increasingly
important cause of illness and death among people with HIV. At
the 4th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Treatment,
Pathogenesis and Prevention last week in Sydney, Australia, researchers presented
2 studies of HIV-HBV and HIV-HCV
coinfected participants in the large SMART study, which looked at structured
interruption of antiretroviral
therapy vs continuous treatment. The
SMART study enrolled 5472 participants with CD4 cell counts above 350 cells/mm3.
Within this group, nearly 17% also had hepatitis B or C:
110
were coinfected with HBV (2.0%);
798 were coinfected with HCV
(14.6%);
14
had both HBV and HCV (0.25%).
Subjects
were randomly assigned either to stay off treatment as long as their CD4 cell
counts remained above 350 cells/mm3 and resume therapy when they fell below 250
cells/mm3 (the drug conservation arm) or to receive continuous therapy without
interruption (the viral suppression arm). As
previously reported, the
study was halted in January 2006, after an interim analysis revealed that
patients who interrupted treatment had a significantly higher risk of opportunistic
illness and death, as well as a slightly higher risk of cardiovascular, liver,
and kidney problems.* Study
1 In
the first study, Ellen Tedaldi and colleagues compared the incidence of opportunistic
and non-opportunistic illnesses and death in the coinfected and HIV monoinfected
patients. Results
HBV
or HCV coinfected individuals and HIV monoinfected subjects had a similar relative
increase in the risk of opportunistic or non-opportunistic disease or death in
the treatment interruption compared with the continuous therapy group: -
hazard ratio 2.58 for coinfected and 2.57 for HIV monoinfected patients for opportunistic
disease or death;
- hazard ratio 1.78 and 1.69, respectively, for non-opportunistic
disease.
Overall,
there were few deaths due to opportunistic disease in either coinfected or HIV
monoinfected patients.
Death rates were comparable
in the 2 groups (0.14 vs 0.8 per 100 person-years).
Coinfected patients had nearly
a 4-fold higher risk of death due to non-opportunistic disease compared with HIV
monoinfected subjects (2.52 vs 0.69 per 100 person-years).
Though they made up just about
17% of the total study population, coinfected patients accounted for nearly half
of all deaths due to non-opportunistic disease.
Findings were similar when only
patients with hepatitis C were analyzed separately.
The main causes of non-opportunistic
death among coinfected patients were substance abuse and non-AIDS defining cancers.
Coinfected
patients had more deaths due to liver or kidney disease, while HIV monoinfected
patients had a slightly higher rate of cardiovascular disease.
Coinfected participants were
significantly more likely to have an unknown cause of death.
The
researchers concluded that interruption of antiretroviral therapy may be particularly
harmful for patients coinfected with hepatitis B and/or C, who already have a
higher underlying risk of death due to non-opportunistic causes. Study
2 In
the second study, Greg Dore and colleagues looked at the likelihood of restarting
HAART among HIV-HBV coinfected, HIV-HCV coinfected patients, and HIV monoinfected.
Several antiretroviral
agents - including 3TC (lamivudine,
Epivir), emtricitabine (Emtriva),
and tenofovir (Viread) -- are
active against both HIV and HBV, so HIV-HBV coinfected patients who interrupt
HAART regimens containing these agents are at risk for progression of both diseases.
Results
HIV-HBV
confected subjects were significantly more likely to restart HAART and did so
sooner after treatment interruption than either HIV monoinfected or HIV-HCV coinfected
patients.
This
was predominantly due to a faster decline in CD4 cell counts in the HIV-HBV group.
These
results suggest that HIV-HBV coinfected patients may experience faster HIV disease
progression after stopping HAART. But it is difficult to draw firm conclusions,
since this group was small, in part because the SMART investigators discouraged
enrollment of patients who needed antiretroviral drugs to control HBV as well
as HIV. The researchers are currently analyzing study data to determine whether
HBV DNA increased in patients who underwent treatment interruption. National
Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of New South Wales,
Sydney, Australia; Service of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Carlos III, Madrid,
Spain; School of Public Health, University of Minnesota; Copenhagen HIV Programme,
Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Infectious and
Tropical Diseases, Brescia, Italy; Medizinische Universitaetsklinik, Bonn, Germany;
Montreal Chest Institute, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada; Temple University
School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Royal Free and University College Medical
School, London, UK; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain. 07/31/07 References
E Tedaldi, M
Puoti, J Neuhaus, andothers. E et al. Opportunistic disease and mortality in patients
coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the
SMART (Strategic Management of Antiretroviral Therapy) study. 4th International
AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention. Sydney,
Australia, July 22-25, 2007. Abstract TUAB203. G
Dore, V Soriano, J Neuhaus, and others. Higher rate of antiretroviral therapy
reinitiation among HIV-HBV coinfected patients in the episodic therapy arm of
the SMART study. 4th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis,
Treatment, and Prevention. Sydney, Australia, July 22-25, 2007. Abstract TUAB204. *
W M El-Sadr, J D Lundgren, J Neaton, and other (the SMART Study Group). CD4+ Count-Guided
Interruption of Antiretroviral Treatment. New England J Medicine 355(22):
2283-2296. November 30, 2006. |