Effects
of Tipranavir/ritonavir Compared to Lopinavir/ritonavir on Changes in Body Composition
and Metabolic Parameters in Treatment-naive Patients Although
some data suggest that the incidence of body composition changes and other metabolic
adverse effects are decreasing due to changes in treatment
regimens, there is evidence that protease
inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral therapy is associated with progressive
lipoatrophy (fat loss), relative
central fat accumulation, and insulin
resistance. 
In a poster exhibition at the 4th International
AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention in
Sydney, Australia (July 22-25, 2007), Dr. Andrew Carr presented data from a study
evaluating changes in body composition and metabolism in 140 antiretroviral-naive
patients randomized to receive tenofovir
(Viread) plus 3TC (lamivudine,
Epivir) plus tipranavir/ritonavir
500/200 mg or 500/100 mg twice daily OR lopinavir/ritonavir
400/100 mg twice daily in a metabolic sub-study. At baseline and at 48 weeks, researchers assessed body composition
(DEXA for total and regional fat; L4-5 abdominal CT scan for subcutaneous and
visceral adipose tissue [SAT; VAT]), and metabolic parameters including blood
lipids, glucose, insulin, adiponectin, and leptin. The primary analysis was the change in limb fat in the tipranavir/ritonavir
100 mg and 200 mg arms vs. lopinavir/ritonavir. Results - Baseline limb fat was higher in both tipranavir/ritonavir
groups vs lopinavir/ritonavir, although medians were comparable.
- At Week 48, limb fat increased more for lopinavir/ritonavir,
but this was not significantly different from the tipranavir/ritonavir groups
(P>0.07).
- VAT and trunk fat decreased in all groups.
- Adiponectin, but not leptin, increased substantially,
but significantly more with tipranavir/ritonavir 100 mg and tipranavir/ritonavir
200 mg (P=0.002).
- No glucose sensitivity changes were observed.
| Parameter |
TPV/r100 |
TPV/r200 |
LPV/r |
p value |
| |
Wk 0 |
Median change Wk 48 |
Wk 0 |
Median change Wk 48 |
Wk 0 |
Median change Wk 48 |
TPV/r 100 mg
vs LPV |
TPV/r 200 mg
vs LPV | |
Limb fat (kg) |
5.9 |
0.41 |
6.2 |
0.83 |
5.0 |
1.17 |
0.072 |
0.163 |
| VAT (cm2) |
72.1 |
-5.7 |
63.2 |
-8.6 |
70.8 |
-3.0 |
0.402 |
0.036 |
| Adiponectin (ng/mL) |
5962 |
4497 |
5347 |
6010 |
5920 |
1360 |
0.002 |
<0.0001 |
|
Leptin (pg/mL) |
3037 |
-39 |
3855 |
608 |
2271 |
1168 |
0.015 |
0.324 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) |
88.6 |
0.0 |
89.0 |
0.9 |
84.0 |
3.8 |
0.320 |
0.355 |
| Insulin (µU/mL) |
5.6 |
-0.8 |
6.1 |
0.6 |
4.5 |
-0.2 |
0.149 |
0.317 |
| HOMA-IR |
1.3 |
-0.1 |
1.4 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
-0.1 |
0.150 |
0.684 | TPV/r
= tipranavir/ritonavirLPV/r = lopinavir/ritonavir Conclusion The authors
concluded, “After 48 weeks, subcutaneous fat increased with both tipranavir/ritonavir
and lopinavir/ritonavir. Tipranavir/ritonavir
treatment was not associated with increased insulin resistance or VAT, in contrast
to previous studies with other PIs.” St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Projeto Praça
Onze – UFRJ Hospital Escola São Francisco de Assis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, AIDS
Research Initiative, Sydney, Australia, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona,
Spain, Fundacion Huesped, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH,
Biberach an der Riss, Germany,Boehringer Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, United
States.08/03/07 Reference A
Carr, R Zajdenverg, C Workman, and others. Effects of tipranavir/ritonavir (500/200
or 500/100 mg BID) in comparison with lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg BID) on
changes in body composition and metabolic parameters in ARV-naïve patients over
48 weeks. 4th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment,
and Prevention. Sydney, Australia, July 22-25, 2007. Abstract (poster) TuPeB072. |