Phase 3 Study Data on Once-daily Darunavir/ritonavir (Prezista/r) Versus Lopinavir/ritonavir
(Kaletra) in Treatment-naïve HIV Patients: The ARTEMIS Trial
By
Ronald Baker, PhD
Preliminary
results of the Phase 3 ARTEMIS trial presented this week at the 47th
Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy in Chicago
(September 17-20, 2007) showed that 84% of treatment-naive patients receiving
darunavir/ritonavir (Prezista,
formerly TMC 114) with tenofovir/emtricitabine
(Truvada) achieved an undetectable viral load (< 50 copies/m/L) at 48 weeks
compared with 78% of patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir
(Kaletra) plus Truvada.
The mean difference in response between the 2 groups was 5.3%. Prezista
is a second generation protease
inhibitor (PI) that is highly active in vitro against both wild-type
and PI-resistant HIV. ARTEMIS (Antiretroviral
Therapy
with TMC114 examined
in
naive subjects)
is the first study of darunavir in HIV patients starting treatment for the first
time. This past
June, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted "fast track"
(accelerated) approval to darunavir for use in combination with other antiretroviral
agents for the treatment of HIV infection in treatment-experienced adults, such
as those infected with HIV strains resistant to more than 1 PI. The current recommended
daily dose of darunavir is 600 mg (two 300 mg tablets) taken orally with 100 mg
ritonavir twice daily with food. The
FDA has not approved the use of darunavir in treatment-naive patients, and use
of the once-daily 800 mg dose used in the ARTEMIS study is experimental. In
the ARTEMIS study, researchers compared the efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir
with versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive adult patients. In a pre-planned
analysis, the study met the primary endpoint of non-inferiority. The 48-week primary
analysis from ARTEMIS will be submitted to the FDA later this year as part of
the post-marketing commitment for darunavir. More
about the ARTEMIS Study ARTEMIS
is an international ongoing, randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial that included
689 treatment-naive adults. Participants enrolled in the study had not previously
received treatment with anti-HIV medications and had a viral load greater than
5000 copies. Overall, the study population had a mean baseline viral load of 4.85
log10 copies/mL and a median CD4 cell count of 225 cells/mm3. Patients
were randomized to receive darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily or, based
on approved dosing in each country, either lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg once
daily or 400/100 mg twice daily, plus a background regimen of Truvada once daily.
Patient randomization was stratified based on viral load and CD4 cell count. 48-week
Efficacy Results In
the per-protocol analysis of 689 patients randomized to the once-daily darunavir/ritonavir
arm (n=343) versus the lopinavir/ritonavir arm (n=346), the 48-week analysis showed
the following:
84% of patients in the darunavir/ritonavir arm achieved an undetectable viral
load (< 50 copies/mL) versus 78% in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm.
The median change in
CD4 cell count from baseline was similar in the darunavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir
arms (137 vs 141 cells/mm3).
48-week
Safety Findings
In the 2 study arms,
the adverse events of at least Grade 2 in severity included diarrhea, nausea,
and rash.
The rate of diarrhea
was 4.1% in the darunavir/ritonavir arm vs 9.8% in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm.
The rate of nausea
was 1.7% in the darunavir/ritonavir arm vs 2.9% in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm.
The rate of rash was
2.6% in the darunavir/ritonavir arm vs 1.2% in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm.
The incidence of Grade
3-4 lipid-related adverse events reported in the darunavir/ritonavir arm was 1.7%
vs 5.2% in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm.
Both treatment arms
had a low incidence of discontinuation.
Discontinuations due
to adverse events were 3.4% in the darunavir/ritonavir arm vs 6.9% in the lopinavir/ritonavir
arm.
These
efficacy and safety findings are summarized in the table below:
| | DRV/r (n=343) | LPV/r (n=346) | DRV/r-LPV/r [95% CI] |
| VL <50 copies/ml (ITT-TLOVR) | |
| All patients | 84% | 78% | 5.3 [-0.5;11.2] |
| BL VL <100,000 | 86% | 85% | 1.3 [-5.2;7.9] |
| BL VL ≥100,000 | 79% | 67% | 12.8 [1.6;24.1] |
| BL CD4 <200 | 79% | 70% | 9.2 [-0.8;19.2] |
| BL CD4 ≥200 | 87% | 84% | 2.3 [-4.6;9.2] |
| AE incidence, n(%)* |
| GI (all
types) | 23(6.7%) | 47(13.6%) | |
| diarrhea | 14(4.1%) | 34(9.8%) | |
| nausea | 6(1.7%) | 10(2.9%) | |
| rash (all
types) | 9(2.6%) | 4(1.2%) | |
DRV/r
= darunavir/ritonavir LPV/r = lopinavir/ritonavir BL = baseline VL =
viral load AE = adverse events GI = gastrointestinal "This
is an important study because it provides information regarding the potential
use of a once daily Prezista regimen for the treatment of adult patients who have
never taken HIV medications before," said Edwin DeJesus, MD, Medical Director
of the Orlando Immunology Center and the HUG-Me Program's adult clinic at Orlando
Regional Medical Center. The
following points should be considered when initiating therapy with darunavir/ritonavir:
Treatment
history and, when available, genotypic or phenotypic resistance testing should
guide the use of darunavir/ritonavir.
The
use of other active antiretroviral agents with darunavir/ritonavir is associated
with a greater likelihood of treatment response.
The
risks and benefits of darunavir/ritonavir have not been established in treatment-naive
adult or pediatric patients.
Important
Safety Information for Prezista
PREZISTA does
not cure HIV infection or AIDS, and does not prevent passing HIV to others. PREZISTA
is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to any of its ingredients. Coadministration
of PREZISTA/ritonavir is contraindicated with drugs that are highly dependent
on CYP3A for clearance and have a narrow therapeutic index (e.g., astemizole,
terfenadine, dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, methylergonovine, cisapride,
pimozide, midazolam, or triazolam) and for which elevated plasma concentrations
are associated with serious and/or life-threatening events. Coadministration is
not recommended with carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampin, lopinavir/ritonavir,
saquinavir, lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, or products containing St. John's
wort (Hypericum perforatum). Caution
should be used when prescribing agents such as sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil,
or other substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP3A in patients receiving PREZISTA/ritonavir.
This list of potential drug interactions is not complete. PREZISTA
must be co-administered with 100 mg ritonavir and food to exert its therapeutic
effect. Failure to correctly administer PREZISTA with ritonavir and food will
result in reduced plasma concentration of PREZISTA that will be insufficient to
achieve the desired antiviral effect. Please refer to ritonavir prescribing information
for additional information on precautionary measures. Severe
skin rash, including erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, has been
reported in subjects receiving PREZISTA during the clinical development program.
In some cases, fever and elevations of transaminases have also been reported.
In clinical trials (n=924), rash (all grades, regardless of causality) occurred
in seven percent of subjects treated with PREZISTA; discontinuation due to rash
was 0.3 percent. Rashes were generally mild-to-moderate, self-limiting and maculopapular.
REZISTA should be discontinued if severe rash develops. PREZISTA
should be used with caution in patients with known sulfonamide allergy. New-onset
or exacerbations of pre-existing diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia, and increased
bleeding in hemophiliacs have been reported in patients receiving protease inhibitors.
A causal relationship between protease inhibitors and these events has not been
established. PREZISTA
should be used with caution in patients with hepatic impairment. There are no
data regarding the use of PREZISTA in patients with varying degrees of hepatic
impairment; therefore, specific dosage recommendations cannot be made. Redistribution
and/or accumulation of body fat have been observed in patients receiving antiretroviral
therapy. The causal relationship, mechanism, and long-term consequences of these
events have not been established. Immune
reconstitution syndrome has been reported in patients treated with antiretroviral
therapy. The
potential for HIV-cross-resistance among protease inhibitors has not been fully
explored in PREZISTA/ritonavir treated patients. PREZISTA
should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential
risk. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. The
effects of PREZISTA on pregnant women or their unborn babies are not known. In
the pooled analysis of POWER 1 and 2 studies, the most frequently reported drug-related
adverse events of at least moderate to severe intensity in patients receiving
PREZISTA/ritonavir-containing regimen were headache (3.8%), diarrhea (2.3%), abdominal
pain (2.3%), constipation (2.3%), and vomiting (1.5%). Prezista
Articles on HIV and Hepatitis.com
09/21/07 Sources E
Dejesus, R Ortiz, H Khanlou, and others. Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Ritonavir
versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir in ARV Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Patients
at Week 48: ARTEMIS. 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and
Chemotherapy. Chicago, September 17-20, 2007. Abstract H-718b. Prezista
Prescribing Information  Tibotec
Therapeutics. New Phase 3 Study in Treatment-naive Adults with HIV Evaluates Efficacy
and Safety of Once-daily Prezista/ritonavir vs. Kaletra ad Part of HIV Combination
Therapy. Press Release. September 18, 2007.
|