Modern
HAART Is Associated with Better Adherence and Greater Efficacy than Older Regimens
By
Liz HighleymanIt
is clear that treatment outcomes have dramatically improved since the introduction
of effective combination antiretroviral
therapy in the mid-1990s, and since then HAART
efficacy has improved over time as new and better drugs have been developed.
But the factors that contribute to this improved treatment success are not yet
fully understood.
To shed further light on this issue, Italian investigators
retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of first-line regimens in 1998 and in 2006.
Results were presented last week at the 9th International
Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection (HIV9) in Glasgow, Scotland.
The
analysis included all 146 patients starting first-line HAART at their institutions
during these years (67 in 1998; 79 in 2006). About three-quarters were men, the
mean age was 38 years, the mean baseline CD4 count was 250 cells/mm3, and baseline
viral load was 5.66 log10 copies/mL. The 1998 and 2006 groups had similar baseline
values.
Using clinical records, the researchers collected data on patient
age, sex, HIV risk factors, co-morbidities, CDC AIDS disease stage, treatment
adherence, and any recorded toxicity-related adverse events or treatment modifications.
They also looked at baseline, 24-week, and 48-week CD4 cell counts, HIV viral
load, and levels of blood glucose, total cholesterol, and triglycerides.
Results
HIV suppression at 48 weeks was
observed in 59.1% of patients in 1998 and 88.6% in 2006 (P < 0.001).
In a multivariate analysis, virological
suppression was independently associated only with:
48-week adherence (odds ratio
[OR] 20.6; P < 0.001);
Being treated in 2006 vs 1998
(OR 8.6; P < 0.001).
Adherence to HAART was significantly
associated with better CD4 cell recovery at 24 and 48 weeks (P = 0.01 and 0.02,
respectively).
Demographic factors, baseline immune
parameters, and adverse events did not significantly alter the likelihood of achieving
virological suppression.
"Our
results indicate that after 48 weeks, patients treated with more recent first-line
regimens have better chances of viral suppression and immune recovery than at
the dawn of HAART," the researchers concluded.
"Adherence to
therapy seems to be increased in parallel over time, and to be tightly associated
with both outcomes," they added. "The independent association of better
outcomes with the year of treatment and not with any other factor, including the
incidence of adverse events, would suggest greater intrinsic potency of new HAART
regimens."
Ospedale Civile Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy; Department
of Infectious Disease - University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Ospedale "Santa
Maria della Misericordia", Perugia, Italy; Ospedale "SS. Annunziata"
- University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy; Ospedale "L. Sacco", Milano,
Italy; Section of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Chiety, Chieti,
Italy.
11/18/08
Reference F Sozio, V Soddu, G De Socio,
and others. Comparison of the efficacy at 48 weeks of first-line antiretroviral
treatment for HIV infection in 1998 and 2006: a multicentric investigation. 9th
International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection. Glasgow, Scotland. November
9-13, 2008. Journal of the International AIDS Society 11(Suppl 1):P19.
November 10, 2008. |