Factors That Affect Success of Interferon-based Treatment for Hepatitis C A new study on predicting outcomes
of standard treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV)
infection found that a number of factors influenced responses, including the
form of the interferon
given. However, for some HCV genotypes, few of these factors play a role.
The results of this study appear in the July 2007 issue of Hepatology, the official journal
of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), published
by John Wiley & Sons. Hepatology is available online via Wiley InterScience
at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/hepatology.
About
4 million people in the U.S.
have been infected with HCV, and more than 3 million have chronic HCV infection.
Hepatitis C accounts for approximately 40% of all chronic liver disease and is
the most frequent indication for liver
transplants.
The
current standard of care for chronic HCV infection is the combination of pegylated
interferon alfa plus ribavirin,
but this treatment can be difficult to tolerate. Many people experience adverse
side effects that may include fatigue, flu-like symptoms, depression,
fever, and anemia. These symptoms can
be severe enough to cause patients to discontinue treatment.
Researchers
led by Lisa Backus, MD, of the Center for Quality Management in Public Health
located at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System in Palo
Alto, CA, conducted a large retrospective study to
analyze predictors of sustained virological response
(SVR), or undetectable virus in the blood 6 months after finishing treatment.
The
researchers used a time frame of 3 months or later to determine SVR, because a
previous study showed that 98% of relapses occur within 3 months of stopping treatment.
The study included 5944 predominantly male patients receiving care at VA medical
facilities.
The researchers were able to identify several independent
predictors of achieving SVR after treatment. “In many of the previous trials only
a few of these factors were identified,” they stated. “The expanded range of predictors
may assist clinicians and patients in more accurately assessing the likelihood
of an SVR and thus in making more informed treatment decisions.”
The
results confirmed previous trials that identified independent several factors
that predicted sustained response, including:
·Low levels of HCV in the blood;
·Absence of cirrhosis;
·HCV genotypes other than genotype 1;
·Elevated levels of the liver enzyme ALT.
They
also confirmed significantly lower SVR rates among African-Americans compared with Caucasians, and among patients who had
not responded to prior treatment with conventional (non-pegylated)
interferon.
The
results provide new information indicating that the form of pegylated
interferon may affect the likelihood of SVR: Patients treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys)
were 40% more likely to achieve SVR than those treated with pegylated
interferon alfa-2b (PegIntron). The 2 forms differ in
pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and method of determining dosage.
In
addition, the study identified low baseline blood cholesterol as a negative predictor
of SVR. “Low cholesterol may indicate more severe liver disease and subsequent
reduced treatment response,” the researchers noted.
In this study, 80%
of the participants had HCV genotype 1. Few of the significant independent predictors
of SVR in patients with this genotype influenced the sustained response rate for
patients with HCV genotype 2, and even fewer did so for those with genotype 3.
These
results suggest that patients with genotype 2 are more likely to respond to hepatitis
C treatment than those with genotype 3, and that SVR predictors differed between
these 2 genotypes, as well as from those for genotype 1.
“Our findings
serve as a reminder that response rates in routine medical practice may be lower
than those in clinical trials,” the researchers stated.
This
may be due to the fact that a substantial percentage of the study patients would
have been excluded from clinical trials for having factors that negatively predict
SVR. The study also showed higher treatment discontinuation rates than in clinical
trials, possibly because patients in trials are generally extremely motivated
and usually agree to continue treatment regardless of their response or lack thereof.
The researchers concluded that, “with the demonstrated efficacy of pegylated interferon/ribavirin against
HCV, it is increasingly important to understand the predictors of response to
this treatment. Just as SVR rates differ substantially by genotype, so too do
the significant SVR predictors.”
This research was supported by the
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
07/17/07
Reference L I Backus, D B Boothroyd,
B R Phillips, and L A Mole.Predictors of Response of U.S.
Veterans to Treatment for the Hepatitis C Virus.Hepatology46(1): 37-47. July 2007[Epub June 13, 2007].