Large
International
Trial
Finds
Continuous
Anti-HIV
Therapy
Is
Greatly
Superior
to
Treatment
Interruptions:
The
SMART
Study
Following
several
years
of
experimentation
in
the
US
and
abroad
with
treatment
interruptions
as
a strategy
for
anti-HIV
therapy,
a large
international
trial
comparing
this
strategy
to
continuous
therapy
(no
interruptions
of
therapy)
has
stopped
enrolling
study
participants,
a decision
that
may
result
in
an
end
to
all
further
testing
of
treatment
interruption
strategies
in
the
US.
The
trial
comparing
continuous
antiretroviral
therapy
with
episodic
drug
treatment
(treatment
interruptions)
guided
by
levels
of
CD4+
cells
was
halted
because
those
patients
receiving
episodic
therapy
had
twice
the
risk
of
HIV
disease
progression
(the
development
of
clinical
AIDS
or
death),
the
major
outcome
of
the
study,
according
to
an
announcement
by
the
National
Institute
of
Allergy
and
Infectious
Diseases
(NIAID),
a part
of
the
US
National
Institutes
of
Health
(NIH).
NIAID
made
the
decision
to
halt
enrollment
in
collaboration
with
the
study’s
Executive
Committee
and
following
a recommendation
received
from
an
independent
Data
and
Safety
Monitoring
Board
(DSMB).
The
DSMB,
charged
with
regularly
evaluating
data
and
safety
issues
during
the
multi-year
trial,
conducted
a review
of
the
interim
study
data
in
early
January. The
trial,
known
as
SMART
(Strategies
for
Management
of
Anti-Retroviral
Therapy),
was
designed
to
determine
which
of
two
different
HIV
treatment
strategies
would
result
in
greater
overall
clinical
benefit.
HIV-positive
volunteers
were
assigned
at
random
to
either
a viral
suppression
strategy,
in
which
antiretroviral
therapy
(ART)
was
taken
on
an
ongoing
basis
to
suppress
HIV
viral
load;
or
a drug
conservation
strategy,
in
which
ART
was
started
only
when
the
levels
of
key
immune
cells,
called
CD4+
cells,
dropped
below
250
cells
per
cubic
millimeter
(mm3).
Volunteers
in
the
drug
conservation
group
were
taken
off
ART—with
the
aims
of
reducing
drug
side
effects
and
preserving
treatment
options—whenever
their
CD4+
cells
were
above
350
cells/mm3.
The
trial
involved
an
international
collaboration
of
318
clinical
sites
in
33
countries.
It
began
enrollment
in
January
2002
and
had
successfully
recruited
more
than
90
percent
of
its
target
of
6,000
participants.
As
of
January
11,
2006,
when
enrollment
was
stopped,
5,472
volunteers
had
joined
the
study. At
the
time
of
the
DSMB
review,
the
average
follow-up
was
approximately
15
months.
The
analysis
revealed
that
participants
on
CD4+
cell-guided
episodic
treatment
faced
more
than
twice
the
risk
of
disease
progression
relative
to
participants
on
continuous
ART.
Furthermore,
there
was
an
increase
in
major
complications
such
as
cardiovascular,
kidney
and
liver
diseases
in
the
participants
on
the
drug
conservation
arm.
These
complications
have
been
associated
with
ART,
and
it
was
hoped
that
they
would
be
seen
less
frequently
in
those
patients
receiving
less
drug.
Although
the
risk-to-benefit
ratio
of
drug
conservation
over
the
longer
term
remains
uncertain,
the
DSMB
recommended
that
enrollment
into
the
trial
be
halted
in
light
of
the
findings
to
date,
and
the
SMART
Executive
Committee
and
NIAID
agreed
with
the
recommendation.
Upon
reviewing
the
results,
the
Executive
Committee
also
conveyed
to
local
study
investigators
its
recommendation
that
it
would
be
prudent
to
re-initiate
therapy
in
ART-experienced
patients
in
the
drug
conservation
arm.
All
study
physicians
and
participants
are
being
notified
of
the
findings
and
recommendations.
Follow-up
visits
will
continue
for
all
participants
in
the
SMART
trial
while
the
study
team
considers
plans
for
longer
follow-up.
The
investigators
will
analyze
the
SMART
study
data
in
detail
to
gain
insights
into
the
reasons
for
the
increased
risk. “SMART
is
one
of
the
largest
HIV/AIDS
treatment
trials
ever
conducted,”
notes
NIAID
Director
Anthony
S.
Fauci,
M.D.
“The
study
reflects
an
extraordinary
global
collaboration
among
hundreds
of
dedicated
AIDS
clinicians
and
thousands
of
their
patients,
all
of
whom
should
be
commended
for
their
exceptional
achievement
in
contributing
to
this
pivotal
HIV/AIDS
treatment
study.” “This
trial
was
designed
to
help
physicians
and
their
HIV-positive
patients
identify
the
best
approach
to
treatment
management,”
adds
Wafaa
El-Sadr,
M.D.,
M.P.H.,
M.P.A.,
of
the
Harlem
Hospital
Center
and
Columbia
University
in
New
York
City,
one
of
the
principal
investigators
for
the
trial.
“We
were
surprised
to
learn
that
in
the
short
term,
episodic
antiretroviral
therapy
carries
such
an
increased
risk
without
evidence
of
sparing
patients
the
known
side
effects
associated
with
ART.”
The
University
of
Minnesota’s
James
Neaton,
Ph.D.,
another
principal
investigator
and
chief
biostatistician
for
the
trial,
notes,
“The
SMART
trial
reached
a conclusion
much
earlier
than
we
expected.
That
is
the
significant
value
and
potential
power
of
conducting
such
a large
trial.”
The
SMART
study
was
coordinated
by
four
international
centers:
the
Medical
Research
Council
Clinical
Trials
Unit
in
London;
the
Copenhagen
HIV
Program
in
Denmark;
the
National
Centre
in
HIV
Epidemiology
and
Clinical
Research
at
the
University
of
New
South
Wales
in
Sydney,
Australia;
and
the
Terry
Beirn
Community
Programs
for
Clinical
Research
on
AIDS
(CPCRA)
in
Washington,
DC.
The
statistical
and
data
management
center
was
based
at
the
University
of
Minnesota
in
Minneapolis. Fred
Gordin,
M.D.,
of
the
VA
Medical
Center
in
Washington,
DC,
the
CPCRA
director,
says,
“It
is
gratifying
when
the
fruits
of
such
hard
work
by
so
many
individuals
and
the
faith
put
in
the
investigators
by
the
volunteers
results
in
important
data
concerning
the
use
of
ART.” David
Cooper,
M.D.,
D.Sc.,
of
the
National
Centre
in
HIV
Epidemiology
and
Clinical
Research
at
the
University
of
New
South
Wales,
the
Sydney
international
coordinating
center
director,
notes,
“SMART
is
an
example
of
how
a large
group
of
investigators
around
the
world
can
work
together
to
obtain
an
answer
to
an
important
HIV
treatment
question.” Further
information
concerning
the
SMART
study
findings
can
be
found
in
a
Question
and
Answer
document
also
posted
on
HIV
and
Hepatitis.com. 01/20/06 Source NIAID.
International
HIV/AIDS
Trial
Finds
Continuous
Antiretroviral
Therapy
Superior
to
Episodic
Therapy.
Press
Release.
January
17,
2006.
Link
to
Index
of
All
HIV
and
AIDS
Articles
by
Topic
|