Questions
and Answers about the SMART Study The
SMART study, a large
international trial comparing continuous anti-HIV therapy with treatment interruptions
guided by CD4 counts was
halted earlier this month when it became clear that patients in the episodic therapy
arm experienced twice the risk for developing clinical AIDS or death than the
continuous therapy arm. Following
is a series of questions and answers about the trial created by the NIAID, including
how the results might contribute to the management of HIV disease: 1. What
is the SMART trial? The
Strategies
for Management of Anti-Retroviral Therapy (SMART) trial is a large international trial designed to determine which
of two distinct HIV treatment strategies yields a better clinical outcome over
the long term. The trial enrolled HIV-positive participants with CD4+ cell counts
of more than 350 cells per cubic millimeter (mm3) of blood. (CD4+ cells are a
type of infection-fighting white blood cell and are a primary target of HIV.)
Volunteers
were randomized to receive one of two antiretroviral treatment (ART) strategies:
continuous drug therapy, designed to suppress viral load as much as possible (the
viral suppression, or VS, arm); or episodic
ART (the drug conservation, or DC, arm). The use of ART
in the DC arm was determined by the participant’s CD4+ cell count: trial
participants in the DC arm began ART when CD4+ cell counts fell below 250 cells/mm3,
with the aim of suppressing viral load and increasing the CD4+ cell count, and
discontinued ART when counts were above 350 cells/mm3. Enrollment
in SMART began in January 2002. Full enrollment of 6,000 participants
was expected to take 3 to 5 years. As of January 11, 2006, when enrollment was
stopped, more than 90 percent of the volunteers had been enrolled. 2.
What were the rationale and primary objectives of the SMART
trial? Widespread
use of ART in economically developed countries has resulted in a significant decline
in HIV-related
illness and death. However, ART effectiveness may wane
over time as the virus becomes resistant to drugs. There are also short-
and long-term toxicities,
as well as cost and quality-of-life issues, associated with lifelong ART. Therefore, a randomized clinical
trial was implemented comparing the use of CD4+ cell-guided episodic ART (DC strategy)
with continuous ART (VS strategy). The
SMART trial was designed to compare the DC strategy with the VS strategy for progression
to AIDS or death over a minimum follow-up period of 6 years for each patient.
It was hypothesized that the DC strategy would result in lower rates of disease
progression and serious toxicities as compared
to the VS strategy in the planned follow-up period ranging from 6 to 9 years. 3.
Who is conducting this study and where? The
Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA,)
was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),
part of the National Institutes of Health, to conduct the study. The CPCRA
is conducting this study, known as CPCRA 065, in collaboration with the Copenhagen
HIV Programme in Denmark (CHIP; the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit in London
(MRC); and the National Centre in HIV Epidemiology
and Clinical Research at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia
(NCHECR).
As of January 11, 2006, 5,472 volunteers had been enrolled at 318 sites in 33
countries. Sites are located in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium,
Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland,
Israel, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Morocco, New Zealand, Norway, Peru,
Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, United Kingdom,
United States, and Uruguay. 4.
What is the Data and Safety Monitoring Board, and how does
it monitor this study? The
Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) is an independent committee composed of
clinical research experts, statisticians, ethicists, and community representatives.
The DSMB reviews data while a clinical trial is in progress to ensure the safety
of participants. The DSMB may recommend that a trial, or part of a trial,
be stopped if there are safety concerns or if the trial objectives have either
been achieved or are unlikely to be achieved. The DSMB looks at analyses that
are not available to the investigators or to anyone else. The SMART study was
monitored at a minimum annually by an NIAID DSMB. 5.
What were the results of the most recent DSMB review? The
DSMB for the SMART trial reviewed interim data from this study in early November
2005 and in early January 2006. At the time of their January review, the average
follow-up was approximately 15 months; some patients had been followed for approximately
3.5 years. The data at the last review indicated that volunteers in the DC arm
of the trial had more than twice the risk of progression
to AIDS or death compared with individuals
in the VS arm. 6.
What actions were taken by the DSMB and the SMART Executive
Committee? On
January 10, 2006, the DSMB informed the Executive Committee that there was an
increased risk of disease progression in the DC group, and that it appeared very
unlikely that the DC arm would be found to be superior to the VS strategy in the
planned follow-up period of the trial. The DSMB recommended that enrollment
into the trial be stopped and that steps be taken to minimize risks to patients.
The SMART Executive Committee decided to recommend to site investigators that
treatment-experienced patients in the DC arm who were not taking ART be re-started
on therapy. On
January 11, 2006, the Executive Committee informed the SMART trial investigators
of 1) the increased risk of disease progression and other clinical events
in the DC arm; 2) treatment recommendations for patients in the DC arm; and 3)
the decision to stop enrollment. Study
participants are currently being notified of the findings and recommendations.
7.
What does the SMART Executive Committee recommend for study
participants? Individuals
currently enrolled in the VS arm of the study will continue to receive care from
their primary care physician and will continue with the VS strategy as defined
in the study. Participants
in the DC arm who are currently on ART will be advised to stay on treatment. Those
participants in the DC arm who are currently off ART, but who have taken ART in
the past, are being advised to review with their physicians the option to re-start
ART. While the long-term risks and benefits of the DC arm remain uncertain,
the short-term information indicates that it would be prudent to re-start ART.
Because
the study findings do not address the question of when to start ART, it is advised
that the decision to initiate ART for those participants in the DC arm who have
never been on ART should be based on local treatment guidelines on when to initiate
ART. Follow-up
visits will continue for all participants in the SMART trial while the study team
considers plans for longer follow-up. Data collection (such as case report
forms and laboratory reports) will continue for all enrollees as specified by
the trial protocol. 8.
How might these new findings affect the management of HIV
disease? The
current U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Guidelines for the
Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents (Oct. 6,
2005) state: “Several clinical trials have been conducted to better understand
the role of treatment interruption in these patients, yielding conflicting results.
The Panel [the Panel on Clinical Practices for Treatment of HIV Infection convened
by DHHS] notes that partial virologic suppression from combination therapy has
been associated with clinical benefits, thus interruption is generally not recommended
unless it is done in a clinical trial setting.” The
data from the SMART trial provide evidence that episodic use of ART based on CD4+
cell levels as used in the study is inferior to use of continuous therapy for
treatment-experienced patients and thus should not be routinely recommended. 9.
What were some of the key baseline characteristics of the
trial participants?
The overwhelming majority (95
percent) of SMART participants have had some experience with ART (a median of
six years of ART use prior to enrollment).
Median baseline
and nadir CD4+ cell counts of study participants were 598 and 253 cells/mm3, respectively.
Seventy
percent of the participants had an HIV viral load < 400 copies/milliliter at
baseline.
The
average age of enrollees at study entry was 46 years.
Twenty
six percent of the participants are women.
Thirty-one percent
of participants are black, and 69 are white or of another race or ethnicity.
Fifty-five
percent of participants were enrolled by sites in the United States, 26 percent by sites in Europe, and the remainder from the other countries.
01/20/06 Source NIAID.
International HIV/AIDS Trial Finds Continuous Antiretroviral Therapy Superior to Episodic Therapy. Press Release.
January 17, 2006.
Link to Index of All HIV and AIDS Articles by
Topic
|