Index of All HIV and AIDS Articles by Topic ( A to Z)


Google_______________

AIDS Could Become a Leading Cause of Illness and Death Worldwide by 2030

By Liz Highleyman

December 1 marks the 18th World AIDS Day, in a year that observed the 25th anniversary of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. According to new report from UNAIDS and the World Health Organization (WHO), there are now nearly 40 million people living with HIV worldwide. During 2006, 4.3 million people were newly infected with the virus, and 2.9 million people died of AIDS-related illnesses.

But AIDS may become an even greater burden in the years to come, according to an article in the November 28, 2006 issue of the open-access journal PLoS Medicine. Using mathematical modeling, WHO researchers calculated that HIV/AIDS could become one of the 3 leading causes of illness worldwide by 2030.

However, the model also showed that expanded efforts to both prevent new infections and provide antiretroviral therapy to more people who need it could dramatically decrease HIV/AIDS morbidity and mortality over the same time period.


Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030

Colin D. Mathers and Dejan Loncar

(Evidence and Information for Policy Cluster, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland)

Background

Global and regional projections of mortality and burden of disease by cause for the years 2000, 2010, and 2030 were published by Murray and Lopez in 1996 as part of the Global Burden of Disease project. These projections, which are based on 1990 data, continue to be widely quoted, although they are substantially outdated; in particular, they substantially underestimated the spread of HIV/AIDS.

To address the widespread demand for information on likely future trends in global health, and thereby to support international health policy and priority setting, the authors have prepared new projections of mortality and burden of disease to 2030 starting from World Health Organization estimates of mortality and burden of disease for 2002. This paper describes the methods, assumptions, input data, and results.

Methods and Findings

Relatively simple models were used to project future health trends under three scenarios-baseline, optimistic, and pessimistic-based largely on projections of economic and social development, and using the historically observed relationships of these with cause-specific mortality rates.

Data inputs have been updated to take account of the greater availability of death registration data and the latest available projections for HIV/AIDS, income, human capital, tobacco smoking, body mass index, and other inputs. In all three scenarios there is a dramatic shift in the distribution of deaths from younger to older ages and from communicable, maternal, perinatal, and nutritional causes to noncommunicable disease causes.

The risk of death for children younger than 5 years is projected to fall by nearly 50% in the baseline scenario between 2002 and 2030. The proportion of deaths due to noncommunicable disease is projected to rise from 59% in 2002 to 69% in 2030.
Global HIV/AIDS deaths are projected to rise from 2.8 million in 2002 to 6.5 million in 2030 under the baseline scenario, which assumes coverage with antiretroviral drugs reaches 80% by 2012.

Under the optimistic scenario, which also assumes increased prevention activity, HIV/AIDS deaths are projected to drop to 3.7 million in 2030.

Total tobacco-attributable deaths are projected to rise from 5.4 million in 2005 to 6.4 million in 2015 and 8.3 million in 2030 under our baseline scenario. Tobacco is projected to kill 50% more people in 2015 than HIV/AIDS, and to be responsible for 10% of all deaths globally.

The three leading causes of burden of disease in 2030 are projected to include HIV/AIDS, unipolar depressive disorders, and ischaemic heart disease in the baseline and pessimistic scenarios.

Road traffic accidents are the fourth leading cause in the baseline scenario, and the third leading cause ahead of ischaemic heart disease in the optimistic scenario.
Under the baseline scenario, HIV/AIDS becomes the leading cause of burden of disease in middle- and low-income countries by 2015.

Projections for HIV/AIDS and Tuberculosis

We used separate projections for HIV/AIDS mortality under several scenarios derived from existing models. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and WHO have prepared projections of HIV/AIDS mortality under a range of assumptions about the future of the HIV epidemics in all regions and with varying treatment scale-up assumptions for both adult and children using a transmission model previously used to assess the impact of preventive interventions.

The model includes underlying regional demography, acquisition of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, and progression from HIV infection to AIDS and death.
For countries with generalized epidemics (mostly in sub-Saharan Africa), the model variables were estimated from sentinel site prevalence data. For countries with epidemics concentrated in groups with higher-risk behaviour, the size and HIV prevalence was estimated for each of these groups, and prevalence in low-risk populations was estimated by allowing for transmission from high-risk to low-risk groups via sexual mixing.

Projections of these epidemics were based on assumptions about degree of saturation for each of the high-risk groups, time to saturation, and spread from high-risk to low-risk populations over time.

Our baseline projections for HIV/AIDS age-sex-specific mortality rates were based on the UNAIDS and WHO "medium" scenario for treatment scale-up. Under this scenario, antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage will reach 80% by 2012 in all regions, remaining constant beyond that year. The treatment scenarios assumed no effect of treatment on transmission and incidence rates, and no additional prevention efforts resulting in reduction of transmission and incidence rates.

Our pessimistic projections for HIV/AIDS age-sex-specific mortality rates were based on the UNAIDS and WHO "slow" scenario for treatment scale-up. Under this scenario, ART coverage will reach 60% by 2012 in all regions except Latin America, where it reaches 70% in 2013. HIV/AIDS mortality rates in high-income countries were assumed to remain constant as in the baseline scenario.

Salomon et al. [1] have modelled scenarios for sub-Saharan Africa combining treatment and additional prevention efforts. In one scenario, ART coverage is scaled up and optimal assumptions are made about treatment impact on transmissibility and patient behaviour.

A second scenario assumes that an emphasis on treatment leads to less effective implementation of prevention, resulting in only 25% attainment of the maximum potential impact of prevention efforts. For our optimistic projection of HIV/AIDS mortality, we used a third unpublished scenario prepared by Salomon et al. that is approximately halfway between their two published mixed treatment-prevention scenarios.

For low- and middle-income countries outside sub-Saharan Africa, we assumed similar proportional reductions in incidence rates for HIV infection due to increased prevention, as estimated for sub-Saharan Africa.

Because of the powerful interaction between tuberculosis and HIV infections in regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, Murray and Lopez modified the original projections from 1990 to 2020 for tuberculosis death rates.

As part of the Global Plan to Stop TB covering the period 2006-2015, the Stop TB Partnership has prepared three projection scenarios for tuberculosis incidence, prevalence, and mortality based on different assumptions about the pace of scale-up and coverage of interventions to achieve the UN's Millennium Development Goals for tuberculosis [2].

The "Global Plan" scenario assumes massive scale-up in tuberculosis control activities, achieving case detection levels of more than 70% and using the WHO DOTS (directly observed therapy, short-course) treatment strategy to reach cure rates of more than 85%.

The "Sustained DOTS" scenario assumes that case detection and treatment success rates increase until 2005 and then remain constant to 2015. A third "No DOTS" scenario assumes that the DOTS treatment strategy was never introduced in any region, so case detection, treatment, and cure rates would continue as they were pre-DOTS.

The projected annual regional trends in tuberculosis death rates for HIV-negative cases under these three scenarios were used to project tuberculosis death rates for countries in each region as follows.

Annual projected trends under the "Sustained DOTS" scenario were used for the baseline projections, and those under the "Global Plan" scenario were used for the optimistic projections. For the pessimistic projections, annual trends in rates were estimated as halfway between those projected under the "sustained DOTS" scenario and those projected under the "No DOTS" scenario from 2006 onwards.

For 2016-2030, annual trends from 2015 to 2030 were assumed to converge on the regional projected trends for Group I causes excluding HIV/AIDS under the baseline scenario. For the optimistic and pessimistic scenarios, annual regional trends were assumed to remain constant from 2015 to 2030.

Conclusions

These projections represent a set of three visions of the future for population health, based on certain explicit assumptions. Despite the wide uncertainty ranges around future projections, they enable us to appreciate better the implications for health and health policy of currently observed trends, and the likely impact of fairly certain future trends, such as the ageing of the population, the continued spread of HIV/AIDS in many regions, and the continuation of the epidemiological transition in developing countries.

The results depend strongly on the assumption that future mortality trends in poor countries will have a relationship to economic and social development similar to those that have occurred in the higher-income countries.

12/01/06

Sources

UNAIDS/WHO. AIDS Epidemic Update: December 2006.

C D Mathers and D Loncar. Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030 . CD, Loncar D (2006) Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Medicine 3(11): e442. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442. November 28, 2006.

References

1. J S Salomon, D Hogan, J Stover, and others. Integrating HIV prevention and treatment: From slogans to impact. PLoS Med 2: e16. 2005.

2. Stop TB Partnership. The global plan to stop TB, 2006-2015 Geneva: WHO. 2006. Available at: http://www.stoptb.org/globalplan/. Accessed 27 October 2006.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FDA-Approved
HIV and AIDS Treatments

Protease Inhibitors
Agenerase (amprenavir)
Aptivus (tipranavir)
Crixivan (indinavir)
Fortovase (saquinavir soft gel)
Invirase (saquinavir hard gel)
Kaletra (lopinavir/ritronavir)
Lexiva
(Fosamprenavir)
Norvir (ritonavir)
Prezista
(darunavir)
Reyataz (atazanavir)
Viracept
(nelfinavir)

Nucleoside / Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Combivir (AZT+ 3TC)
Epivir (lamivudine; 3TC)
Emtriva (emtricitabine; FTC)
Epzicom (abacavir + lamivudine)
Hivid (zalcitabine; ddC)
Retrovir (zidovudine; AZT)
Trizivir (abacavir + zidovudine +lamivudine)
Truvada  (Tenofovir / Emtricitabine)
Videx (didanosine; ddI)
Viread (tenofovir)
Zerit (stavudine; d4T)
Ziagen (abacavir)


non Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Rescriptor (delavirdine)

Sustiva (efavirenz)
Viramune (nevirapine)

Entry Inhibitors
Fuzeon (enfuvirtide; T-20)

Fixed-dose Combinations
Atripla
(efavirenz + emtricitabine + tenofovir)
Combivir
(retrovir + lamivudine)

Trizivir
(abacavir + zidovudine + lamivudine)
Truvada
(tenofovir + emtricitabine)