Google_______________

After 4 Years of Viral Suppression with HAART, HIV Rebound Rates in Patients with Multiple Prior Treatment Failures Resemble Those in Individuals with No Prior Failure

By Ronald Baker, PhD

Successful viral suppression is the primary objective of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Viral suppression allows for immune system stability in HIV-infected people and, ideally, an increase in CD4 cell count.

Researchers with the United Kingdom Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC) Study investigated whether the rate of viral rebound decreases with increasing duration of viral suppression with HAART and, if so, whether rebound rates in patients previously failing antiretroviral regimens ultimately decline to levels as low as those seen in patients who have never experienced virological failure.

In the July 11, 2007 edition of AIDS, Andrew Benzie and colleagues report on the results of a study suggesting that a long period of viral suppression correlates with lower HIV rebound rates in people who have previously experienced treatment failure.

All patients from the UK CHIC Study (n = 21,256) who achieved a viral load of </= 50 copies/mL while receiving HAART were followed until viral rebound (2 consecutive viral loads > 400 copies/mL). Patients could re-enter the analysis if they experienced a subsequent viral load </= 50 copies/ml. Rebound rates were calculated according to the number of regimens previously failed and duration of viral suppression.

Results

Of 12 648 patients on HAART 10,237 (80.9%) achieved a viral load </= 50 copies/mL.

During 26,494 person-years (PY) of follow-up, 1853 patients (18.1%) experienced at least 1 viral rebound event, with 2460 events in total (rebound rate 9.3 [range 8.9-9.7]/100 PY).

Within the first year of viral suppression, the rate of viral rebound was 8.3 (7.5-9.1)/100 PY in patients who had not previously failed treatment, increasing to 32.7 (27.6-37.8)/100 PY in patients who had failed more than 4 regimens.

Irrespective of previous treatment failure, rebound rates in those who remained suppressed for > 4 years were similar to those in patients who had at no time experienced treatment failure.

The authors concluded that after approximately 4 years of viral suppression, rebound rates in individuals with multiple prior treatment failures approach those of individuals with no prior treatment failure.

Discussion

Results of the current study indicate that a lower baseline CD4 cell count was a significant predictor of viral rebound, as concluded based on a prior study (1). A possible explanation for this is that some drugs are not maintained at optimal levels in patients with low CD4 cell counts because of poorer drug absorption, drug-drug interactions, adherence, or other factors.

Baseline viral load at the start of antiretroviral therapy was not associated with an increased risk of rebound, according to the study authors. This result differs from the findings of a prior study in which lower HIV-1 RNA levels at the time of starting treatment independently predicted a higher chance of therapeutic success in terms of achieving and maintaining an undetectable viral load (2).

The authors also found an association between black ethnicity and an increased risk of viral rebound. They surmise that this effect may be due in large measure to socioeconomic factors. Interestingly, the investigators concluded that older age was a significant predictor of a better response in this study. Prior studies have also demonstrated that younger age is associated with poorer responses to therapy (3).

The study authors emphasized the importance of avoiding treatment failure. This can be done by taking anti-HIV medications on time and as recommended. Maintaining a high level of treatment adherence keeps drug levels in the body steady and at the most effective amounts. This limits the ability of HIV to replicate and prevents the development of drug resistance, both of which contribute to viral rebound.

In closing, the authors wrote, "Both clinicians and patients can be encouraged that regardless of previous treatment failure, rebound rates even after multiple previous therapy failure fall to levels approaching those of patients on first line therapy after 4 years of suppressive therapy. This has important implications for providing treatment support and advice during those 4 years of follow up."

St Mary's Hospital, London, UK Royal Free & University College Medical School, London, UK Royal Free NHS Trust, London, UK dGuys, Kings and St. Thomas School of Medicine, London, UK Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital Trust, Brighton, UK Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, UK, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK, Health Protection Agency-Centre for Infections, UK.

07/06/07

Source

A A Benzie, L K Bansi, C A Sabin, and others (on behalf of the United Kingdom Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC) Study). Increased duration of viral suppression is associated with lower viral rebound rates in patients with previous treatment failure. AIDS 21(11): 1423-1430. July 11, 2007.

References

1. V Miller, S Staszewski, C A Sabin, and others. CD4 lymphocyte Count as a Predictor of the Duration of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy-induced Suppression of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Load. Journal of Infectious Diseases 180: 530-533. 1999.

2. R Paredes, A Mocroft, O Kirk, and others. Predictors of Virologic Success and Ensuing Failure in HIV-positive Patients Starting Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in Europe. Archives of Internal Medicine 160: 1123-1132. 2000.

3. J J Parienti, V Massari, D Deschamps, and others. Predictors of Virologic Failure and Resistance in HIV-infected Patients Treated with Nevirapine or Efavirenz-based Antiretroviral Therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38:1311-1316. 2004.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Index of All HIV and AIDS
Articles by Topic ( A to Z)


FDA-Approved
HIV and AIDS Treatments

Protease Inhibitors
Agenerase (amprenavir)
Aptivus (tipranavir)
Crixivan (indinavir)
Fortovase (saquinavir soft gel)
Invirase (saquinavir hard gel)
Kaletra (lopinavir/ritronavir)
Lexiva
(Fosamprenavir)
Norvir (ritonavir)
Prezista
(darunavir)
Reyataz (atazanavir)
Viracept
(nelfinavir)

Nucleoside / Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Combivir (AZT+ 3TC)
Epivir (lamivudine; 3TC)
Emtriva (emtricitabine; FTC)
Epzicom (abacavir + lamivudine)
Hivid (zalcitabine; ddC)
Retrovir (zidovudine; AZT)
Trizivir (abacavir + zidovudine +lamivudine)
Truvada  (Tenofovir / Emtricitabine)
Videx (didanosine; ddI)
Viread (tenofovir)
Zerit (stavudine; d4T)
Ziagen (abacavir)

non Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Rescriptor (delavirdine)

Sustiva (efavirenz)
Viramune (nevirapine)

Entry Inhibitors
Fuzeon (enfuvirtide; T-20)

Fixed-dose Combinations
Atripla
(efavirenz + emtricitabine + tenofovir)
Combivir
(retrovir + lamivudine)

Trizivir
(abacavir + zidovudine + lamivudine)
Truvada
(tenofovir + emtricitabine)