1

HIV and AIDS Articles by Topic - A to Z  

 Google Custom Search

Low Prevalence of Darunavir (Prezista) Resistance Mutations among Patients Who Experienced Treatment Failure with Other Protease Inhibitors

By Liz Highleyman

Two recent studies looked at the prevalence of resistance to the recently approved protease inhibitor (PI) darunavir (Prezista). Within this class of drugs, HIV mutations that confer resistance to one drug may also render other protease inhibitors less effective.

Study 1

As reported in the October 2007 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Spanish researchers examined all clinical specimens from HIV-infected patients on failing PI-based regimens who were referred for drug resistance testing between 1999 and 2007, looking for known darunavir-specific resistance mutations recently published by the International AIDS Society-USA.

Results

·         A total of 1021 HIV genotypes from patients failing treatment with the PIs lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra; 39.2%), nelfinavir (Viracept; 28.1%), saquinavir (Invirase; 14.5%), indinavir (Crixivan; 13.7%), atazanavir (Reyataz; 6.6%), fosamprenavir (Lexiva; 5.3%), and tipranavir (Aptivus; 1.1%) were identified.

·         The prevalence of major darunavir resistance mutations were:

o        I50V: 2.1%

o        I54M: 1.3%

o        L76V: 2.7%

o        I84V: 14.5%.

·         For minor darunavir resistance mutations, the rates were:

o        V11I: 3.3%

o        V32I: 3.9%

o        L33F: 11%

o        I47V: 2.1%

o        I54L: 2.3%

o        G73S: 12.8%

o        L89V: 2.4%.

·         Overall, 6.7% (n = 68) of the genotypes had 3 or more darunavir resistance mutations, which corresponded to a mean total number of PI resistance mutations of 12.3.

·         In a multivariate analysis, prior fosamprenavir failure, prior saquinavir failure, the total number of PI resistance mutations and the number of prior PIs used were all independently associated with having more darunavir resistance mutations.

“The prevalence of darunavir resistance mutations is low in patients failing other PI-based regimens, although prior failure to amprenavir and saquinavir might produce more cross-resistance to darunavir,” the authors concluded. “Thus, darunavir may be a good option for patients who have failed other PI-based regimens.”

Study 2

In the second study, reported in the October 15, 2007 Journal of Infectious Diseases, U.S. researchers similarly assessed the prevalence of 11 known darunavir resistance mutations among patients enrolled in the Kaiser-Permanente health plan in Northern California and a group of non-California patients in the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Of these, 1175 Kaiser-Permanente patients and 2744 in the Stanford database had previously used PIs.

Results
·         The 11 darunavir resistance mutations were rare (typically ≤ 0.5%) in treatment-naive patients.


·         30% of the Northern California patients and 24% in the Stanford database had HIV strains with 1 or more mutations associated with resistance to darunavir.

·         4% in the Kaiser-Permanente group and 1% in the Stanford database had 3-6 darunavir mutations.

·         In a multivariate analysis, the number of darunavir resistance-associated mutations depended on the number of previous PIs a patient had used, and specifically use of amprenavir (Agenerase) or fosamprenavir.

·         Patients with 1-3 darunavir resistance mutations still had a 50% chance of achieving a viral load below 50 copies/mL using ritonavir-boosted darunavir.

·         The researchers identified 16 additional mutations that might confer some degree of resistance to darunavir.
Based on these findings, the authors concluded, “Most PI-treated patients should respond favorably to darunavir-based salvage therapy.” 

Data from these 2 studies support the findings of the recently reported POWER studies, which showed that heavily treatment-experienced patients who took darunavir/ritonavir plus optimized background therapy were significantly more likely to achieve a viral load below 50 copies/mL than those using a comparator boosted PI plus an optimized regimen. 

10/19/07


References

 

E Poveda, C de Mendoza, L Martin-Carbonero, and others. Prevalence of darunavir resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected patients failing other protease inhibitors. J Antimicrob Chemother 60(4):885-888. October 2007.

Y Mitsuya, TF Liu, S-Y Rhee, and others. Prevalence of Darunavir Resistance-Associated Mutations: Patterns of Occurrence and Association with Past Treatment. Journal of Infectious Diseases 196 (8): 1177–1179. October 15, 2007.

 R Haubrich. Defining HIV Susceptibility to New Antiretroviral Agents - Darunavir. Journal of Infectious Diseases 196 (8): 1125–1127. October 15, 2007.

 

 

FDA-Approved
Treatments
Protease Inhibitors
Agenerase
Agenerase (amprenavir)
Aptivus
Aptivus (tipranavir)
Crixivan
Crixivan (indinavir)
Invirase
Invirase (saquinavir hard gel)
Kaletra
Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir)
Lexiva
Lexiva (fosamprenavir)
Norvir
Norvir (ritonavir)
Prezista
Prezista (darunavir)
Reyataz
Reyataz (atazanavir)
Viracept
Viracept (nelfinavir)
Nucleoside / Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
CombivirCombivir (zidovudine/lamivudine)
EpivirEpivir (lamivudine; 3TC)
EmtrivaEmtriva (emtricitabine; FTC)
EpzicomEpzicom (abacavir + lamivudine)
RetrovirRetrovir (zidovudine; AZT)
TrizivirTrizivir (abacavir + zidovudine +lamivudine)
TruvadaTruvada  (tenofovir / emtricitabine)
VidexVidex (didanosine; ddI)
VireadViread (tenofovir)
ZeritZerit (stavudine; d4T)
ZiagenZiagen (abacavir)
non Nucleoside Reverse
Transcriptase Inhibitors
RescriptorRescriptor (delavirdine)
SustivaSustiva (efavirenz)
ViramuneViramune (nevirapine)
Entry Inhibitors
(including Fusion Inhibitors)
Fuzeon (enfuvirtide, T-20)
Selzentry ( maraviroc)
Fixed-dose Combinations
AtriplaAtripla (efavirenz + emtricitabine + tenofovir)
CombivirCombivir (zidovudine + lamivudine)
TrizivirTrizivir (abacavir + zidovudine + lamivudine)
TruvadaTruvada (tenofovir + emtricitabine)