TDF+3TC+d4T Is Significantly Better Tolerated Than ZDV+3TC or ZDV+3TC+NFV as Non-occupational HIV Post-exposure Prophylaxis and Results in Improved Adherence

Non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (NPEP) for HIV is recommended after high-risk sexual exposure. Because of the high incidence of intolerable side effects observed with protease inhibitor- and zidovudine (Retrovir)-based NPEP regimens, researchers at St Vincent’s Hospital in Sydney, Australia changed standard NPEP treatment to 28 days of tenofovir (Viread)-lamivudine (Epivir)-stavudine (Zerit)/ TDF-3TC-d4T.

The aim of this study was to compare side effects and numbers of individuals completing NPEP before and after this change.

Parameters were compared among individuals commencing the following NPEP regimens: zidovudine-lamivudine/ ZDV-3TC, zidovudine-lamivudine-nelfinavir (Viracept)/ ZDV-3TC-NFV and TDF-3TC-d4T.

Results

·         A total of 385 individuals received ZDV-3TC (n=36), ZDV-3TC-NFV (n=225) or TDF-3TC-d4T (n=137) as NPEP for the first time between June 1999 and November 2003.

·         Non-completion rates were 25%, 32% and 15%, respectively (P=0.001).

·         Adverse events were less common in the TDF-3TC-d4T group, with significantly lower rates of nausea and headache, but significantly higher rates of peripheral neuropathy and asymptomatic raised transaminases.

·         There was no HIV seroconversion in any group.

Based on these findings, the authors conclude, “TDF-3TC-d4T is significantly better tolerated than ZDV-3TC or ZDV-3TC-NFV as NPEP and results in greater numbers of individuals completing 28 days of treatment.”

Department of Immunology, HIV and Infectious Diseases, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

05/27/05

Reference
A Winston and others. The use of a triple nucleoside-nucleotide regimen for nonoccupational HIV post-exposure prophylaxis. HIV Medicine 6(3):191-197. May 2005.

Link to Index of All HIV and AIDS Articles by Topic