|
FRAM Study Finds No Association between Fat Loss and Fat Accumulation
in Men with HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy
By Ronald
Baker, PhD
Over
the past decade, individuals with HIV infection have reported changes
in body fat distribution, including peripheral
lipoatrophy (fat loss) of face and limbs and lipohypertrophy
(fat accumulation) in the form of dorsocervical fat
pads, multiple lipomas, increased breast size, abdominal girth,
and visceral adipose tissue (VAT).
These two conditions have usually been referred to collectively
as HIV-related
lipodystrophy or fat redistribution syndrome.
HIV-related
lipodystrophy has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular
disease due to significant changes in the metabolic
parameters of affected patients. In addition, these body fat changes
have been severe enough to result in the stigmatization of many
HIV positive individuals. This in turn has caused some patients
either to stop taking their anti-HIV therapy or to postpone antiretroviral
treatment, even when initiation of therapy is warranted.
Thus
far, HIV-related lipodystrophy has been defined in studies based
on a number of different perspectives: some by self-report, confirmed
by a health care provider, on changes in either peripheral or central
body sites. Some combine changes into one syndrome, and others report
separately on lipoatrophy only, lipohypertrophy only, and combined
syndromes. As a result of these differing perspectives, there has
been considerable debate about an accurate definition of the syndrome(s).
In
the recently published Fat Redistribution and Metabolic Changes
in HIV Infection (FRAM) study [1], Carl Grunfeld et al evaluated
self-reported changes in fat and physical examination findings by
trained observers using specialized equipment. According to the
authors, the study objectives were “to compare fat distribution
as assessed by self-report, physical examination, and measurement
by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in HIV-infected men with that
in controls (HIV-uninfected men) and within HIV-infected men, to
evaluate the interrelationships of fat distribution across peripheral
and central regions, and their associations with antiretroviral (ARV) therapy.”
Results
of the FRAM observational study appear in the October 1, 2005 issue
of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (JAIDS)
and are summarized below:
Results
|
HIV-infected
subjects were selected from patients seen in 16 HIV or infectious
disease clinics or cohorts during 1999; Control subjects were
recruited from 2 centers of the Coronary Artery Risk Development
in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. |
|
Findings
represent results of examinations of 425 HIV-infected men and
152 control men in the 33- to 45-year age range. |
 |
HIV-positive
men reported more fat loss than controls in all peripheral and
most central depots. |
 |
Peripheral
lipoatrophy was more frequent in HIV-positive men than in controls
(38.3% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001), whereas central lipohypertrophy
was less frequent (40.2% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.001). |
 |
Among
HIV-positive men, the presence of central lipohypertrophy was
not positively associated with peripheral lipoatrophy. |
 |
On
MRI, HIV-positive men with clinical peripheral lipoatrophy had
less subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in peripheral and central
sites and less visceral adipose tissue (VAT) than HIV-positive
men without peripheral lipoatrophy. |
 |
HIV-positive
men both with and without lipoatrophy had less SAT than controls,
with legs and lower trunk more affected than upper trunk. |
 |
Use
of the antiretroviral drugs stavudine
[Zerit] or indinavir
[Crixivan] was associated with less leg SAT but did not
appear to be associated with more VAT; |
 |
Nevirapine
(Viramune) use was associated with less VAT. |
In
conclusion, the authors write, “Both peripheral and central subcutaneous
lipoatrophy was found in HIV infection. Lipoatrophy in HIV-positive
men is not associated with reciprocally increased VAT.” Further,
they note that HIV positive men had less lipohypertrophy than controls,
all of whom were HIV negative.
Discussion
The
findings of the FRAM study show that HIV-infected men who had peripheral
lipoatrophy had less adipose tissue in each peripheral and central
depot than HIV-infected men without peripheral lipoatrophy.
Furthermore,
HIV-infected men with or without peripheral lipoatrophy had less
adipose tissue in both peripheral and central subcutaneous sites
compared with control subjects, with lower body more affected than
upper body using direct measurements of adipose tissue volume.
“Clinically,
HIV-infected men were more likely to have peripheral lipoatrophy
than controls, but they also had more central lipoatrophy and less
central lipohypertrophy,” write the FRAM study authors.
The
findings from self-report also show that loss of fat in peripheral
and most central subcutaneous depots distinguished all HIV-infected
men from controls. Furthermore, use of stavudine or indinavir was
associated with less leg SAT, but the use of these drugs did not
appear to be associated with more VAT.
“Thus,”
say the authors, “our results argue against the proposals in earlier
reports of a reciprocal syndrome of lipodystrophy in which peripheral
fat loss is accompanied by central fat gain, including increased
VAT.”
Furthermore,
the authors conclude the data from this study suggest that future
research studies of fat distribution in HIV-infected persons should
focus on subcutaneous lipoatrophy and “direct measurements of regional
adipose tissue (rather than surveys or subjective examination) should
be used to determine cause and associated metabolic
findings.”
In
an editorial accompanying the FRAM study and also published in the
October 1, 2005 issue of JAIDS [2], authors Milan Khara and
Brian Conway state that the FRAM study demonstrates “there is no
single morphologic syndrome in which an individual develops fat
loss in the limbs and face and fat accumulation in the abdomen.”
“The
key finding [of the FRAM study] was that a significantly greater
proportion of HIV-infected men lost peripheral and central fat compared
to control men, and that this was mild in half or more of the cases,”
according to Khara and Conway.
In
addition, they write, “There was no reciprocal increase in visceral
fat. In fact, fat accumulation was more prevalent in the control
group. Fat loss was associated with the use of stavudine and indinavir,
but no other antiretroviral agents. There was no association of
fat accumulation with any HAART components, except that nevirapine
perhaps exerted a protective effect.”
It
is hoped that the FRAM study findings will help lead researchers
to the discovery of the causes of HIV-associated body fat changes
and how best to prevent and treat them. Clearly this rigorous study
contributes the methodology required to more accurately evaluate
these changes.
|
|
Sub
Topics for Lipodystrophy-related Articles on HIVandHepatitis.com
|
|
|
|
10/03/05
References
1.
C Grunfeld and others. Fat Distribution in Men with HIV Infection. From the
Study of Fat Redistribution and Metabolic Change in HIV Infection
(FRAM). Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
40(2):121-131. October 1, 2005.
2.
M Khara and B Conway. Morphologic Changes in HIV-Infected Men: Sorting
Fact from Fiction. Journal of Acquired
Immune Deficiency Syndromes
40(2): 119-120. October 1, 2005.
|
Link
to FDA-approved Anti-HIV Drugs
|
|
|
|
|
|