|
Clinical
Efficacy of Combination Therapy Based on Protease Inhibitors or
the NNRTIs Nevirapine and Delavirdine: An Indirect Comparison
The
aim of the current study was to compare the clinical efficacy of
triple antiretroviral regimens based on protease inhibitors and
non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)
in adults positive for antibodies to HIV-1.
The
investigators employed a systematic review and meta-analysis using
indirect comparisons of clinical trials comparing three drug regimens
based on two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)
and either a protease inhibitor or an NNRTI with two drug regimens
(two NRTIs).
Participants
had no previous exposure to protease inhibitors or NNRTIs. Data
sources included Medline, the Cochrane controlled trials register,
Aidstrials, Aidsdrugs, conference proceedings, and trial registers.
The
main outcome measure was progression to AIDS or death.
Results
14
trials, totaling 6785 patients, were identified. Most patients had
been exposed to an NRTI and had advanced immunodeficiency at baseline;
1096 progressed to AIDS or died.
Seven
trials assessed protease inhibitors based triple regimens and seven
assessed NNRTI-based triple regimens nevirapine [Viramune]
or delavirdine [Resciptor]).
Triple
therapy was more effective than dual therapy. The effect was pronounced
for protease inhibitor-based regimens but non-significant for NNRTI-based
regimens. Indirect comparison of the two regimens gave an odds ratio
of 0.54 in favour of protease inhibitor-based treatments.
Increases
in CD4 cell counts were smaller and suppression of viral replication
less with NNRTI-based regimens.
According
to the authors, “Indirect evidence shows that protease inhibitor-based
triple regimens are superior to regimens based on the NNRTIs nevirapine
and delavirdine in patients with advanced immunodeficiency who have
been exposed to NRTIs. Large trials with clinical end points are
required.”
Service
Universitaire des Maladies Infectieuses et du Voyageur, Centre Hospitalier
de Tourcoing, Faculte de Medecine de Lille, BP 619, F 59208 Tourcoing,
France.
Editor’s
Note: Interestingly, efavirenz (Sustiva)-based regimens were not
evaluated in this study.
02/04/04
Reference
Y
Yazdanpanah and others. British Medical Journal. 328(7434):
249. January 31, 2004; Epub January 23, 2004.
|