|
Patients
Want Treatment Information Sources That Address Their Individual
Needs and Concerns
Not much is known about HIV patients’ evaluations of treatment information
sources. The aim of this study was to profile patients' satisfaction
with information they have received about HAART
in relation to treatment uptake.
As
part of a prospective investigation into uptake and adherence to HAART,
115 participants, comprising predominantly gay men, completed validated
questionnaires investigating their satisfaction with information
relating to practical aspects and potential problems of HAART, perceptions
of information from different sources and beliefs about HAART, following
a clinically recommended treatment offer.
Results
·
There
was a wide range of total satisfaction scores indicating variation
in patients' information requirements.
·
Those
who declined HAART were less satisfied with the information they
had received than those who accepted the treatment recommendations
(p < 0.05).
·
Lower
levels of satisfaction were associated with stronger concerns about
the potential adverse
effects of HAART (p < 0.05).
·
Concerns
about HAART were related to uptake of HAART with those declining
treatment being significantly more concerned about potential adverse
effects than those who accepted the treatment offer (p < 0.001).
·
The
most helpful sources of information noted by the patients were specialist
HIV staff: hospital consultants, pharmacists and nurses, as well
as other people with HIV.
Conclusions
The
authors conclude, “This study improves our understanding of how
information about HAART is perceived by people faced with treatment
decisions. It emphasizes the importance of providing information
tailored to meet the needs of individual patients and address their
specific concerns, in order to support informed decision-making.”
Centre for Health Care
Research, Postgraduate Medical School, University of Brighton, Falmer,
UK.
04/25/05
Reference
G
Gellaitry and others. Patients' perception of information about
HAART: impact on treatment decisions. AIDS Care 17(3): 367-76.
April 2005.
|