|
Should
Boosted Norvir Regimens Be Among the First Options Considered for
Use in HIV Clinical Practice?
Boosted protease inhibitor regimens combine Norvir (ritonavir)
with a second, 'boosted' protease inhibitor to enhance patient exposure
to the latter agent, thereby preventing or overcoming resistance
and allowing less frequent dosing, potentially improving adherence.
The advantages offered by ritonavir boosting are primarily
attributable to the drug's pharmacokinetic properties. Ritonavir's
inhibition of the cytochrome P-450 CYP3A4 enzyme reduces the metabolism
of concomitantly administered protease inhibitors and changes their
pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the curve (AUC),
maximum concentration (Cmax), minimum concentration (Cmin) and half-life
(t1/2).
As a result, the bioavailability of the boosted protease inhibitor
is increased and improved penetration into HIV reservoirs may be
achieved. Boosted protease inhibitor regimens that utilize a low
dose of ritonavir (100-200 mg) appear to offer the best balance
of efficacy and tolerability. At this dose, ritonavir boosts the
bioavailability of the second protease inhibitor without contributing
significantly to the side effect profile of the regimen.
In clinical trials, regimens boosted with low dose ritonavir
have demonstrated high levels of viral suppression in both antiretroviral
naive patients and patients who previously failed antiretroviral
therapy, including protease inhibitor therapy. Side effects observed
have generally been similar to those associated with the boosted
protease inhibitor.
The authors conclude, “Based upon their enhanced drug exposure
and demonstrated efficacy, the boosted ritonavir regimens should
be among the first options considered for use in clinical practice.”
Clinical Development, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA,
USA.
01/07/04
Reference
RK Zeldin and RA Petruschke (Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA). Pharmacological
and therapeutic properties of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor
therapy in HIV-infected patients. Journal of Antimicrobial
Chemotherapy 53(1): 4-9. January 2004.
|
|