Ritonavir-boosted Reyataz (atazanavir) Regimen Produces HIV Viral Load Decrease Comparable to Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) Regimen at 24 Weeks

Twenty-four (24)-week data suggest that a treatment regimen comprised of Reyataz (atazanavir) plus low-dose ritonavir provides potency against HIV that is comparable to a Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir)-based regimen in treatment-experienced patients.

The data were presented 7/15/03 at the 2nd International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment (July 13-16, Paris, France).

Reyataz is the recently-approved (6/20/03) protease inhibitor (PI) from Bristol-Myers Squibb and is the first once-daily PI. Kaletra, also a protease inhibitor, is a potent anti-HIV drug that has demonstrated durable suppression of the virus. According to its manufacturer, Abbott Labs, Kaletra is currently the most widely used PI in the US and Europe.

“More and more physicians are prescribing multiple protease inhibitor-containing regimens in treatment-experienced patients….This early evidence that Reyataz, when boosted with [low dose] ritonavir, is comparable to Kaletra is very encouraging,” said Bonaventura Clotet, PhD, Director of the Retrovirology Laboratory and HIV Unit at the Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol and Associate Professor of Medicine at the Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain.

Comparison of Lipid Profiles

Additional data from the study suggest Reyataz-containing regimens have a more favorable lipid profile compared to the Kaletra regimen. The lipid profiles were evaluated by mean percent changes from baseline in total cholesterol, fasting LDL cholesterol, and fasting serum triglyceride concentrations

Study Results

The 24-week interim analysis of this 48-week study examined 358 randomized patients who were highly treatment-experienced – meaning they had failed two or more HAART (Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy) regimens, including at least one agent from each class of oral HAART. 

The primary objective of the triple-arm study was to compare the magnitude of plasma HIV RNA reduction from baseline of a regimen containing once-daily Reyataz 300 mg boosted with 100 mg of ritonavir to a regimen containing twice-daily Kaletra and a regimen containing once-daily Reyataz 400 mg with 1200 mg of saquinavir, all in combination with once-daily tenofovir 300 mg and one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). 

Secondary objectives of the study included the effect of each regimen on the proportion of patients with HIV RNA levels below 400 copies/mL and 50 copies/mL, CD4 cell count changes from baseline, serum lipid changes from baseline, and safety and tolerability.

Results through week 24 demonstrated that the ritonavir-boosted Reyataz regimen had comparable antiviral activity to the Kaletra-containing regimen.  The dual-PI combination arm of Reyataz and saquinavir showed less antiviral activity than the other two regimens at the interim 24-week analysis. *

Both boosted regimens resulted in similar decreases from baseline in HIV RNA, with mean changes of -1.86 log10 copies/mL for the ritonavir-boosted Reyataz arm (N=120) and -1.89 log10 copies/mL for the Kaletra arm (N=123). 

However, the Reyataz/saquinavir arm produced less of a decrease than the boosted regimens with a mean change of -1.52 log10 copies/mL (N=115). 

The proportion of patients with HIV RNA levels below 400 copies/mL and 50 copies/mL using an intent-to-treat analysis were similar in the Reyataz/ritonavir (64% and 39%) and Kaletra (62% and 42%) arms, but were lower in the Reyataz/saquinavir arm (44% and 23%). 

Mean increases from baseline in CD4 cell counts through week 24 were similar between the ritonavir-boosted Reyataz (83 cells/mm3) and Kaletra (90 cells/mm3) regimens and less for the Reyataz/saquinavir regimen (59 cells/mm3).

Adverse Effects

Moderate to severe adverse events (AEs) occurred with comparable frequency across all regimens and were consistent with the known safety profiles of the study drugs. 

The most commonly observed AE in the Reyataz/ritonavir arm was jaundice, which occurred in six percent of patients and was not associated with an increased risk of liver injury or treatment discontinuation. 

Other common side effects in the Reyataz/ritonavir and Reyataz/ saquinavir arms were nausea (2%, 7%), diarrhea (3%, 5%), scleral icterus (3%, 0%) and vomiting (0%, 4%). 

The most common side effect in the Kaletra arm was diarrhea (11%).

Sources
B Clotet and others.  Atazanavir with ritonavir or saquinavir vs lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures: 24 week results from BMS A1424-045.  Abstract 118. Abstracts of the 2nd IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. July 13-16, 2003. Paris, France.

Bristol-Myers Squibb. Regimen containing ritonavir-boosted Reyataz (atazanavir sulfate) demonstrates comparable viral load reduction through week 24 to a regimen containing Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) in highly treatment-experienced HIV/AIDS patients. Press Release. July 15, 2003.

R Baker. FDA Approves Bristol-Myers Squibb's Once Daily Protease Inhibitor Reyataz (atazanavir) for HIV Infection. HIV and Hepatitis.com. June 21, 2003.

FDA Product Label Atazanavir / Reyataz. HIV and Hepatitis.com

B Boyle. Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) Summary on HIV and Hepatitis.com

 


HOME | HIV AND AIDS
| HEPATITIS B | HEPATITIS C | HIV / HBV CO-INFECTION | HIV / HCV CO-INFECTION | HEALTH
LOGY
|
TESTS | INTERNET CONFERENCE REPORTS | LINKS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US