|
Can
Immune Markers Predict Subsequent Discordance Between Immunologic
and Virologic Responses to Antiretroviral Therapy?
Effective antiretroviral therapy rapidly lowers plasma HIV-1
RNA concentrations, increases the number of circulating CD4+ T
cells, and reduces morbidity and mortality
among persons with advanced HIV disease.
The
CD4+ T cell response to therapy is
biphasic, with the initial increase largely reflecting
redistribution of lymphocytes from tissues into blood, and with subsequent increases reflecting overall
increased CD4+ T cell numbers.
The
strength of the inverse correlation between the
decrease in the HIV-1 RNA level and the increase
in the CD4+ T cell count is only
moderate. Some patients with incomplete virologic suppression
experience sustained CD4+ cell lymphocyte
increases.
Conversely,
suppression of plasma viremia does not assure
immune restoration. Such discordant responses suggest
that factors in addition to the decrease in
the plasma HIV-1 RNA level influence CD4+
lymphocyte recovery.
The
current study examined whether selected immune markers could help predict discordance between virologic
and immunologic responses at 24 weeks of antiretroviral
therapy.
Ten
diverse, prospective antiretroviral studies with 1007
evaluable subjects were included. Subsets of
subjects at increased risk for discordance were identified by recursive partitioning.
The
strongest predictor of more-favorable immunologic than
virologic responses was a lower baseline CD4+
lymphocyte count.
Weaker
predictors in small subsets of subjects were fewer
activated CD4+ lymphocytes and fewer CD8+
lymphocytes.
Conversely,
the strongest predictors of more favorable-virologic
than immunologic responses were higher baseline
CD4+ lymphocyte count and percentage. Additional
predictors in some analyses were higher CD8+
lymphocyte count or percentage and lower HIV-1
RNA concentrations.
Baseline markers of immune activation and naive/memory lymphocyte
subsets had limited ability to predict subsequent
discordance.
Discussion
In
the present exploratory study, the strongest and
most consistent baseline predictors of subsequent discordance were absolute CD4+ T cell counts and
percentages. In some analyses, absolute CD8+
T cell counts and percentages, numbers of activated
CD4+ T cells, and HIV-1 RNA concentrations also identified small subgroups of subjects most
likely to experience subsequent discordance.
In
contrast, serum neopterin and beta-2 microglobulin concentrations at baseline did not help to predict discordance.
The
predictive value of HIV-1 RNA level at baseline
at least in part reflects the discordance definitions
that were used. Achieving plasma HIV-1 RNA levels
less than the limits of quantification at the
end of an evaluation interval was a major
indicator of virologic success, although the magnitude of HIV-1 RNA change was incorporated into most discordance definitions. Therefore, subjects with
low but detectable HIV-1 RNA levels at the
start of an evaluation interval were most likely
to achieve virologic success.
Previous
studies have described immunologic changes that occur during the response to antiretroviral therapy,
and some have examined the ability of laboratory
values other than HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell values to predict subsequent events. Such factors have
included soluble and cellular markers of immune
activation. Better definitions of whether such markers predict clinically relevant laboratory and/or clinical
parameters may ultimately influence patient care.
Some
subjects receiving potent antiretroviral therapy control
HIV-1 replication but experience limited CD4+
T cell increases, whereas others maintain higher CD4+ T cell counts despite having ongoing
viremia. Predicting the trajectory of decreases
in the CD4+ T cell count or the likelihood
of HIV-related complications could influence management decisions, in both treatment-naive and -experienced
patients.
09/10/03
Reference
John Spritzler and others (for the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group).
Can Immune Markers Predict Subsequent Discordance between Immunologic and Virologic Responses to Antiretroviral Therapy? Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Clinical Infectious Diseases 37:551-558. August
15, 2003.
|