|

Genotypic
Assays
Several approaches to
genotyping are available, ranging from full-length sequencing of
the target gene to point mutation assays, which focus only on a
particular mutation of interest. The most commonly used genotypic
assays rely on automated DNA sequencing. Using this technique, the
nucleotide sequence of some or all of the gene of interest (e.g.,
protease [PR] or reverse transcriptase [RT]) is obtained, then translated
into the predicted amino acid sequence in order to determine whether
specific mutations are present or absent. Automated sequencing offers
the most complete data on viral genotype, but generates more information
than is needed for most clinical purposes. For example, HIV-1 RT
has 550 amino acids, but mutations at only a small number of these
positions are implicated in drug resistance. Therefore, interpretation
of the genotype is needed in order to help distinguish which changes
are merely polymorphisms and which might be significantly associated
with drug resistance.
Most commercially available
genotypic tests rely on automated sequencing technology. Viral RNA
is extracted from a sample of plasma and reverse transcribed into
complementary DNA in the laboratory. The PR- and RT-coding regions
of the cDNA are then amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR),
and the nucleotide sequence of the PCR product (or amplicon) is
determined on an automated DNA sequencer. Some laboratories use
specific kits developed by companies such as ABI/Perkin Elmer or
Visible Genetics, Inc. to perform genotyping. Usually the kits provide
standardized reagents needed for the RT-PCR and DNA sequencing steps.
Other laboratories use so-called "home brew" assays using
reagents and primers developed individually by each laboratory.
A list of the mutations most often associated with resistance to
currently available drugs is given in Table
1.
Other types of genotypic
resistance assays such as the Line Probe Assay (LiPA; Innogenetics)
(3) or the differential probe hybridization
assay being developed by Bayer (4) are
designed to provide more limited information by testing for the
presence or absence of specific mutations at particular positions,
or codons. These assays have the advantage of being faster and less
complex than standard genotyping, and may be more sensitive at detecting
minor species. However, because these tests do not generate a comprehensive
sequence, information needed to interpret complex genotypes might
be missing. Furthermore, the tests must be reconfigured to include
important new mutations as they are defined.
4/15/01
Copyright 2001
by HIV and Hepatitis.com. All Rights Reserved
|
 |