One pill per day does not necessarily lead to more durable HIV suppression than regimens containing more pills taken twice-daily, according to a study presented at the recent 7th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention (IAS 2013) in Kuala Lumpur.
Single-tablet regimens (STRs) containing a complete combination antiretroviral regimen in a once-daily coformulated pill are considered a breakthrough in treatment simplicity and convenience. Some studies have found that they promote better adherence, which is associated with reduced risk of virological failure and disease progression.
The currently approved STRs -- Atripla (efavirenz/tenofovir/emtricitabine), Complera (rilpivirine/tenofovir/emtricitabine), and Stribild (elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir/emtricitabine) -- are highly effective and generally well-tolerated, though many people experience central nervous side effects caused by efavirenz.
Benoit Trottier from Clinique Medicale L'Actuel in Montréal and colleagues conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who started ART since 2007. Their aim was to compare regimens that maximize convenience versus those with minimal side effects. Some prior studies have found that absence of toxicities is a more important factor for regimen durability than simplicity, they noted as background.
The study included 575 patients at their clinic who started one of 4 recommended first-line ART regimens:
More than 90% of participants were men and the median age was about 40 years. The median baseline CD4 T-cell count was approximately 300 cells/mm3, with 16% having <200 cells/mm3.
The primary endpoint was time until discontinuation of the first-line regimen, though NRTI backbone changes were allowed for those using non-STR combinations. The secondary endpoint was time to loss of virological response. The median duration of follow-up was just under 3 years.
Results
"Our findings suggest that [single-tablet regimens] do not necessarily result in a more durable treatment," the researchers concluded. "Even with a higher pill burden and multiple doses, a 2 NRTI + raltegravir regimen is more durable" than Atripla or the other combinations.
"The main reason for first line discontinuation/switch remain the adverse drug effects, very few virological failure[s] were observed," they continued. However, Initiating antiretroviral treatment with a STR or raltegravir-based treatment "seems to provide a longer virological control compared to other non-STR regimens studied."
These findings are limited to the specific drugs in Atripla and may not apply to other available STRs, which do not contain efavirenz. However, those coformulations are still too new to allow for such a large retrospective comparison.
8/7/13
Reference
B Trottier, N Machouf, R Thomas, et al. Single tablet regimens do not necessarily translate into more durable HIV treatments. 7th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention. Kuala Lumpur, June 30-July 3, 2013. Abstract TUPDB0106.