| Should 
Entecavir (Baraclude) and Tenofovir (Viread) Be First-line Treatment for Chronic 
Hepatitis B? At 
the annual Digestive Disease Week (DDW 2009) meeting 
this week in Chicago, a panel of experts discussed the prevention and management 
of antiviral drug resistance in patients receiving long-term treatment for chronic 
hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, according to DDW Daily News, the official 
conference newspaper.  |  |  | Anna 
Lok, MD, MSc, MPH | 
 The 
clinical symposium entitled "Avoiding HBV Drug Resistance: How Many Drugs?" 
featured a panel consisting of moderator George Lau, MD, from the University of 
Hong Kong; Anna Lok, MD, MSc, MPH, from the University of Michigan Health System 
in Ann Arbor; Daryl Lau, MD, from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard 
Medical School in Boston; and Marc Ghany, MD, from the Liver Diseases Branch of 
the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, part of 
the National Institutes of Health. Newer, 
more potent nucleoside analogs have demonstrated much lower rates of antiviral 
resistance than older agents such as lamivudine 
(Epivir-HBV), according to the panel members. Speaking during the discussion, 
Dr. Ghany said, "The panel consensus is entecavir 
(Baraclude) and tenofovir (Viread) 
should be first-line [treatment]."  The 
incidence of viral resistance to lamivudine -- the former standard of care -- 
rises from 24% after 1 year of treatment to 67% in year 4, reported Dr. Daryl 
Lau. "It is no longer best for long-term therapy of chronic HBV," he 
said. Several 
factors contribute to development of resistance, said Dr. Lok. These include viral 
factors, such as the rate of HBV replication and the number of pre-existing viral 
mutations; the drug's potency and genetic barriers to resistance; and factors 
relating to the host, such as prior treatment, adherence, pharmacogenetics, and 
body size. Adverse consequences of drug resistance include hepatitis flares and 
hepatic decompensation due to ongoing viral replication. The 
frequency of viral resistance depends on the patient population, definitions of 
drug resistance, and measurement techniques. Dr. Lok defined viral resistance 
-- characterized by virological breakthrough -- as an increase in serum HBV DNA 
of greater than or equal to 1 log above the nadir (lowest-ever) level or reappearance 
of detectable HBV DNA. Predictors 
of Viral Resistance The 
GLOBE Trial showed that a high HBV DNA level at week 24 of treatment predicts 
viral resistance, Dr. Ghany said, "The take-home message is: if your patient 
has a high viral load at week 24, you better do something, because these patients 
have a high risk of developing resistance." Dr. 
Ghany recommended changing therapy if treatment response is suboptimal, and listed 
other ways to prevent viral resistance include avoiding inappropriate antiviral 
treatment, using a potent agent that has a high genetic barrier to resistance, 
reinforcing patient adherence, and starting treatment with a combination regimen. To 
prevent multidrug resistance, he suggested avoiding sequential monotherapy -- 
adding a single new drug after the previous one fails -- and choosing agents that 
do not share a cross-resistance profile. For instance, a patient with viral resistant 
to lamivudine is less likely to respond to telbivudine 
(Tyzeka). Jury 
Still Out on Combination Therapy for Hepatitis B Dr. 
George Lau also spoke about combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B. The rationale 
for combination therapy, he noted, is to enhance viral potency and increase the 
genetic barrier to resistance.  There 
are conflicting results in the medical literature on differences in HBV DNA suppression 
between monotherapy and combination therapy. Some randomized clinical trials found 
that antiviral efficacy is enhanced with the use of combination regimens. "The 
first virologic breakthrough should be managed with combination therapy, not by 
switching to another [single-agent] treatment," he said. An 
exception, he added, is lamivudine 
plus adefovir (Hepsera), since 
a study last year showed no greater antiviral effect with the combination versus 
lamivudine alone. In 
considering combination therapy, a clinician must weigh the potential benefits 
against the drawbacks, including potentially higher treatment costs, more difficult 
adherence, and additive side effects that include an increased risk of peripheral 
neuropathy with telbivudine 
and pegylated interferon (Pegasys). Patients 
that may especially benefit from combination therapy, he concluded, include those 
with liver cirrhosis, HIV-HBV coinfection, suboptimal response to an initial drug, 
and established resistance to antiviral medications. Drs. 
Lok and Daryl Lau remarked that because extensive data are only available for 
the older nucleoside analogs, more research using the newer drugs is needed to 
determine the benefits of combination therapy. 6/05/09 SourceHepatitis 
B antiviral drug resistance common but avoidable. DDW Daily News. Digestive 
Disease Week (DDW 2009). June 2, 2009.
 
 
                                   |