| Tenofovir 
(Viread) Is Similarly Effective in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Regardless of 
Liver Cirrhosis Status By 
Liz Highleyman
 Tenofovir 
(Viread) is the most recently approved nucleoside/nucleotide drug for the 
treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; 
it is also approved as a component of antiretroviral 
therapy for HIV, and is included in the Truvada 
and Atripla fixed-dose combination 
pills.
 In a presentation at the 44th Annual Meeting 
of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL 2009) last month 
in Copenhagen, researchers reported that over 96 weeks, tenofovir worked well 
in people with or without liver 
cirrhosis.
 
 It is well known that interferon-based 
therapy for chronic hepatitis B or C works better and is more easily tolerated 
in people who have not yet developed advanced liver damage, but the influence 
of cirrhosis on the effectiveness of nucleoside/nucleotide agents is unclear.
 
 The 
present analysis included cirrhotic patients who received tenofovir for 96 weeks 
in studies GS-174-0102 (Study 102) and GS-174-0103 (Study 103), two Phase 3 hepatitis 
B registration trials sponsored by tenofovir manufacturer Gilead Sciences.
 
 Study 
102 included hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg) negative chronic hepatitis 
B patients and Study 103 included HBeAg positive patients. Otherwise, the study 
protocols were the same. About three-quarters of participants were men, about 
60% were white, about 30% were Asian, and the median ages were 47 in the cirrhotic 
group and 39 years in the non-cirrhotic group.
 
 At baseline, all participants 
had elevated ALT (median 92 U/L in the cirrhotic group and 108 in the non-cirrhotic 
group) and HBV DNA >100,000 copies/mL. Of the total 426 participants in both 
studies combined, 81 (19%) had cirrhosis: 47 in the HBeAg negative group and 34 
in the HBeAg positive group.
 
 Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) 
to receive 300 mg tenofovir or 10 mg adefovir 
(Hepsera) once-daily for 48 weeks. Patients who underwent liver biopsy at 
week 48 were eligible to receive open-label tenofovir for an additional 7 years, 
with an option to add another drug with dual activity against HBV and HIV -- emtricitabine 
(Emtriva; combined with tenofovir in the Truvada combination pill) -- after 
week 72 if they still had confirmed HBV DNA > 400 copies/mL.
 
 Results
  
 Similar proportions of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients achieved HBV DNA suppression 
< 400 c/mL at week 96: 
  
 90% vs 85%, respectively, in an intent-to-treat analysis; 
 
  97% versus 95%, respectively, in an observed or as-treated analysis.
  
 No cirrhotic patients, but 7 non-cirrhotic patients, experienced viral breakthrough 
over 96 weeks (> 1 log increase or rising above 400 copies/mL after 
falling below this level). 
 
  Among participants who remained on telbivudine, 83% of cirrhotic patients and 
78% of non-cirrhotic patients had normal ALT levels at week 96 (median 34 and 
35 U/L, respectively). 
 
  Among HBeAg positive participants with 96 week serology results available, 9 of 
29 cirrhotic patients (31%) and 25 of 103 non-cirrhotic patients (24%) experienced 
HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe, not a statistically significant difference. 
 
  2 HBeAg positive patients with cirrhosis (6%) experienced hepatitis B surface 
antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion to anti-HBs, compared with none of the HBeAg negative 
cirrhotic patients. 
 
  Treatment was well-tolerated overall, although there was a non-significant trend 
toward more adverse events (AEs) among patients with cirrhosis: 
  
 11% of cirrhotic and 13% of non-cirrhotic patients experienced grade 3 or 4 AEs; 
 
  15% and 9%, respectively, experienced serious AEs; 
 
  31% and 23%, respectively, experienced grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities.
  
 1 patient with cirrhosis developed hepatocellular 
carcinoma. 
 
  No patients with cirrhosis progressed to clinically evident liver decompensation. 
 
  No cirrhotic patients developed kidney toxicity as indicated by confirmed creatinine 
increase of 0.5 mg/dL, creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min, or phosphorous < 
2 mg/dL (a potential concern with both tenofovir and adefovir). 
 
  No tenofovir-associated resistance mutations were detected through week 96.
 Based 
on these findings, the researchers concluded, "The efficacy and safety of 
[tenofovir] at 96 weeks was not influenced by the existence of cirrhosis at onset 
of therapy and was comparable among cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with 
good tolerability in both populations."
 Hospital General Universitari 
Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece; Hopital 
Claude Huriez, CHRU Lille, France; Intern Klinika, UVN Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; 
Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada; AW Morrow Gastroenterology & Liver 
Center, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia; Digestive Disease 
Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Klinik & Poliklinik 
f. Innere Medizin, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Toronto 
Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, 
France; Gilead Sciences, Durham, NC.
 
 5/08/09
 ReferenceM 
Buti, S Hadziyannis, P Mathurin, and others. Two 
years safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with 
HBV-induced cirrhosis. 44th Annual Meeting of the European Association for 
the Study of the Liver (EASL 2009). Copenhagen, Denmark. April 22-26, 2009. Abstract 
21.
 
 
 EASL 
2009 MAIN PAGE                
  
 
 
                                             15th 
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2009)Coverage 
by HIV and Hepatitis.com - February 8 - 11, 2009, Montreal
 HIV and AIDS Treatment 
News, Experimental News, FDA-approved News
   Highlights 
of the 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2009) 
- Coverage by HIV and Hepatitis.com, February 8 - 11, 2009, Montreal                         
   | 
   |