HLA-B*5701
Genetic Testing Effectively Predicts Which Patients Are at Risk for Abacavir (Ziagen)
Hypersensitivity Reactions
By
Liz Highleyman Many
doctors are hesitant to prescribe the NRTI abacavir
(Ziagen) due to the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. The drug is also a
component of the fixed-dose combination pills Trizivir
(AZT/3TC/abacavir) and Epzicom
(3TC/abacavir). The
hypersensitivity reaction -- which has been seen in about 3%-8% of cases - is
typically characterized by skin rash, fever, and gastrointestinal and respiratory
symptoms. Individuals who experience such a reaction should never take abacavir
again, since doing so can be life-threatening. Because of this danger, physicians
recommend that patients stop taking the abacavir when there is any reason to suspect
a reaction. However, this may lead to some individuals avoiding the drug unnecessarily,
since their symptoms may not truly be due to hypersensitivity. In
recent years, researchers have confirmed that a specific human genetic variation,
known as HLA-B*5071,
is associated with susceptibility to abacavir hypersensitivity. At
the 4th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Treatment, Pathogenesis and
Prevention this week in Sydney, Australia, researchers presented data showing
that a genetic test for HLA-B*5071 accurately predicts which patients are at risk
for hypersensitivity. In
the PREDICT-1 study (funded by abacavir manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline), 1956 abacavir-naive
subjects from 314 centers in Europe and Australia started abacavir-containing
antiretroviral regimens. Participants received pharmacogenetic screening for the
HLA-B*5071 gene variation. About half used the test results to determine whether
they should use abacavir, while the remainder had their test results stored for
later analysis. If
a person experienced a suspected abacavir hypersensitivity reaction, the drug
was stopped immediately and the individual received a skin patch test to provide
immunological confirmation that the reaction was related to abacavir hypersensitivity.
A total of 1650
patients who started abacavir and had available follow-up data were included in
the final analysis; of these, 84% were white and 12% were of African descent.
Results
Patients in the intervention
arm (genetic test used to guide treatment) were about half as likely to as those
without test guidance to develop hypersensitivity reactions (3.4% vs 7.8%, respectively).
2.7% of patients in the arm
without test guidance had immunologically confirmed hypersensitivity reactions,
compared with none in the intervention arm.
The test had a negative predictive value of 100%.
The positive predictive value was 48% (i.e., some people who tested positive for
HLA-B*5701 did not have hypersensitivity reactions).
Fewer than half the patients with suspected hypersensitivity reactions in the
arm without test guidance had immunologically confirmed hypersensitivity.
Patients with immunologically
confirmed reactions had more symptoms than those with misdiagnosed hypersensitivity.
Subjects who started abacavir and an NNRTI at the same time were more likely to
have suspected hypersensitivity reactions.
"The
results from this landmark study demonstrate that prospective HLA-B*5701 screening
results in a dramatic, clinically relevant and statistically significant reduction
in abacavir hypersensitivity reactions," the researchers concluded. They
added that, "The PREDICT-1 study provides the high level of evidence required
to support the implementation of HLA-B*5701 screening into routine clinical practice
and is the first randomised, blinded and powered study to validate pharmacogenetic
screening as a clinical tool to personalise therapy." Another
study presented at the conference also found that HLA-B*5071 screening reduced
the risk of abacavir hypersensitivity reactions in a "real world" clinical
setting. Among
231 patients at a Montreal clinic who started abacavir after pre-treatment genetic
screening was implemented in April 2006, none experienced a hypersensitivity reaction.
Prior to implementation of pre-treatment screening, 71% of patients with clinically
suspected hypersensitivity reactions were found to be HLA-B*5701 negative when
tested retrospectively, suggesting that physicians tended to "over diagnose"
abacavir hypersensitivity. HLA-B*5071
screening in black patients The
HLA-B*5071 variation occurs with different frequencies in people of different
racial/ethnic groups. It is more common in whites and more rare in people of African
descent (though less so in African-Americans compared with Africans due to more
racial mixing). In
a related study also presented in Sydney, researchers sought to estimate the sensitivity
of the HLA-B*5701 gene in whites and blacks using skin patch testing to supplement
clinical diagnosis of abacavir hypersensitivity reactions. In the patch test,
a small amount of abacavir is applied to the skin, and a hard, raised, red area
develops if a person is hypersensitive.
The SHAPE study included 130 white
patients with clinically suspected hypersensitivity reactions, 202 white control
subjects who tolerated abacavir with no hypersensitivity, 69 African-American
patients with suspected hypersensitivity, and 206 black control subjects.
Results
All patients with a positive
skin patch test result also tested positive for HLA-B*5701.
However, not all patients who tested HLA-B*5701 positive had a positive skin patch
test.
44% of whites
with suspected reactions were later confirmed to be HLA-B*5701 positive, compared
with 14% of blacks.
The sensitivity of HLA-B*5701 as a marker for hypersensitivity reactions when
skin patch testing was done was 100% for both white and black patients.
In this study, too, most
confirmed reactions involved multiple symptoms, which almost always included fever
(96% of cases).
"These
data suggest that prospective HLA-B*5701 screening may reduce abacavir hypersensitivity
reaction rates in whites and blacks," the researchers concluded. Nevertheless,
they cautioned - echoing the PREDICT-1 researchers - that "HLA-B*5701 screening
may augment clinical management of hypersensitivity reaction, but must never substitute
for clinical vigilance." 07/27/07 References
S Mallal, E
Phillips, G Carosi, and others. PREDICT-1: a novel randomised prospective study
to determine the clinical utility of HLA-B*5701 screening to reduce abacavir hypersensitivity
in HIV-1 infected subjects (study CNA106030). 4th International AIDS Society Conference
on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention. Sydney, Australia, July 22-25,
2007. Abstract WESS101. B
Trottier, R Thomas, VK Nguyen, and others. How effectively HLA screening can reduce
the early discontinuation of abacavir in real life? 4th International AIDS Society
Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention. Sydney, Australia,
July 22-25, 2007. Abstract MOAB103. M
Saag, R Balu, P Brachman, and others. High sensitivity of HLA-B*5701 in Whites
and Blacks in immunologically-confirmed cases of abacavir hypersensitivity (ABC
HSR). 4th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment,
and Prevention. Sydney, Australia, July 22-25, 2007. Abstract WEAB305. |