Switching
to Truvada More Effective than Epzicom Due to Abacavir Hypersensitivity
By
Liz Highleyman In
an effort to improve treatment convenience and adherence, researchers have studied
various ways of simplifying antiretroviral
therapy, including use of fixed-dose
combinations that allow patients to take fewer pills per day.
As
reported in a late-breaker session at the 4th International
AIDS Society Conference on HIV Treatment, Pathogenesis and Prevention held
last week in Sydney, Australia, investigators studied treatment outcomes in patients
with fully suppressed HIV who switched to one of 2 fixed-dose combination pills:
Truvada:
tenofovir + emtricitabine 
Epzicom:
abacavir + 3TC. 
The
open-label BICOMBO study included 335 participants in Spain with viral loads of
less than 200 cells/mm3 who were receiving regimens containing 3TC
(lamivudine, Epivir). Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 arms.
About 75% were men, the median age was 43 years, the median baseline CD4 cell
count was about 500 cells/mm3, and about one-third were coinfected
with hepatitis C virus. Patients
were randomly assigned to switch their current NRTIs to either Truvada or Epzicom,
while staying on the same NNRTI or protease inhibitor. (Some subjects changed
from individual drugs to the corresponding combinations pill, e.g., from separate
emtricitabine + tenofovir to Truvada.) Subjects were not screened in advance for
abacavir hypersensitivity. Results
After 48 weeks, significantly
more patients in the Epzicom arm experienced treatment failure compared with the
Truvada arm (19% vs 13%).
Rates of virological failure
were low in both arms: 2.4% of those taking Epzicom and none of those taking Truvada.
CD4 cell counts increased more
in the Epzicom arm (+44 cells/mm3) than in the Truvada arm (-3 cells/mm3).
About twice as many patients
in the Epzicom arm discontinued treatment early due to adverse events compared
with the Truvada arm (10.2% vs 5.4%).
In the Epzicom arm, 9 subjects
had suspected abacavir hypersensitivity reactions.
Patients taking Truvada had
lower fasting triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL
or "bad") cholesterol levels, but also had lower levels of high-density
lipoprotein (HDL or "good") cholesterol.
Among 47 patients who received
DEXA fat measurements, there were no significant differences in limb fat changes
in the 2 arms.
Changes in creatinine and GFR (markers of kidney toxicity) were small and similar
in both arms.
Conclusion The
researchers concluded that switching the NRTI component of an existing suppressive
regimen to Epzicom was non-inferior to Truvada in terms of virological efficacy,
but not in terms of overall treatment effectiveness. The
difference, they said, was "mainly driven by [Epzicom] interruptions due
to suspected abacavir hypersensitivity." These data suggest that pre-screening
patients using the new
HLA-B*5071 genetic test might help select a subgroup of individuals who could
benefit as much from Epzicom as from Truvada. Hospital
Clinic Universitari, Infectious Diseases, Barcelona, Spain; Principe Asturias,
Medicina, Oviedo, Spain; Bellvitge, Infectious Diseases, Barcelona, Spainl; Vall
d´Hebron, Infectious Diseases, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital del Mar, Infectious
Diseases, Barcelona, Spain; Clinico San Carlos, Medicina, Madrid, Spain; Hospital
de Elche, Medicina, Elche, Spain; Hospital Calella, Medicina, Calella, Spain;
Fundacio IrsiCaixa, HIV, Barcelona, Spain; Mutua de Tarrasa, Medicina, Tarrasa,
Spain; Hospital Clinic Universitari, Pharmacology, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital
Clinic Universitari, Biostatistics, Barcelona, Spain. 07/31/07 Reference E
Martinez, JA Arranz, D Podzamczer, and others. Efficacy and safety of NRTIs switch
to tenofovir plus emtricitabine (Truvada) vs. abacavir plus lamivudine (Kivexa)
in patients with virologic suppression receiving a lamivudine containing HAART:
the BICOMBO study. 4th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis,
Treatment and Prevention. Sydney, Australia, July 22-25, 2007. Abstract WESS102. |