Boosted
Atazanavir and Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) Have Similar Efficacy, but Side Effects
Differ across Racial/ethnic Groups
By
Ronald Baker, PhD
| Reyataz
Capsule | | Kaletra
Tablet |
Race-based
differences in efficacy and safety have been reported among HIV positive individuals
on HAART. However, data on
this issue are limited. It is widely known that rates of obesity, diabetes, and
the metabolic syndrome are increasing. In addition, studies suggest that certain
racial/ethnic groups may be more susceptible to the risks associated with these
conditions.
Ritonavir-boosted
atazanavir (Reyataz) is a potent and generally well-tolerated once-daily HIV
protease inhibitor (PI) that has been extensively studied in both treatment-naive
and treatment-experienced individuals.
At the XVII
International AIDS Conference last week in Mexico City (August 3-8, 2008),
researchers presented results
of the CASTLE trial, which assessed the potential differences in treatment
effectiveness and safety in treatment-naive patients with a variety of racial/ethnic
backgrounds.
The primary objective of this substudy was to analyze the
48-week CASTLE efficacy and safety data by racial/ethnic group and to assess the
virologic, immunologic, and safety profiles of both an atazanavir/ritonavir-based
regimen and a lopinavir/ritonavir
(Kaletra)-based regimen.
CASTLE is a randomized, open label, prospective
study comparing once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir vs twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir,
both in combination with fixed-dose tenofovir/emtricitabine
(Truvada) in treatment-naive HIV patients.
The primary endpoint of
the study was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week
48. For this analysis, the proportion of patients with < 50 copies/mL (confirmed
virological response, non-completer equals failure), CD4 cell count changes, adverse
events (AEs), and fasting lipid changes were presented by race/ethnicity (classified
as white, black, Asian, or other) through week 48. Results
Of 883 randomized
patients, 48% were white, 18% were black, 9% were Asian, and 24% were "other"
(Hispanic/Latino 6%, Mestizo 67%, mixed race 27%); racial/ethnic classification
was similar between the 2 treatment arms.
In the overall
study population, 78% of those on atazanavir/ritonavir and 76% on lopinavir/ritonavir
achieved HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL.
Virological
response to the 2 regimens was consistently high across all racial/ethnic subgroups.
Overall, median
CD4 cell count increases from baseline to week 48 were 191 cells/mm3 for the atazanavir/ritonavir
group vs 200 cells mm3 for the atazanavir/ritonavir group.
Among whites,
the median increase was 226 cells/ mm3 for the atazanavir/ritonavir group vs 204
cells mm3 for the lopinavir/ritonavir group.
Among blacks,
the median increase was 142 cells mm3 for the atazanavir/ritonavir group vs 190
cells mm3 for the lopinavir/ritonavir group.
Among Asians,
the median increase was 198 cells mm3 for the atazanavir/ritonavir group vs 200
cells mm3 for the lopinavir/ritonavir group.
Adverse events
were not treatment limiting in most cases.
The incidence
of AE leading to discontinuation of study therapy was low overall population (2%
with atazanavir/ritonavir, 3% with lopinavir/ritonavir).
More patients
receiving atazanavir/ritonavir discontinued due to jaundice or hyperbilirubinemia
(<1% vs 0), while more people receiving lopinavir/ritonavir discontinued due
to diarrhea (<1% vs 0).
Overall, the
incidences of jaundice and hyperbilirubinemia (all grades) in the atazanavir/ritonavir
group were lowest in blacks (2% and 4%, respectively) and highest in Asians (26%
and 40%, respectively).
As expected,
patients taking atazanavir/ritonavir had fewer gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, regardless
of race/ethnicity.
Among patients
receiving lopinavir/ritonavir, diarrhea was most frequent among whites (14%) and
lowest among blacks (5%).
Patients receiving
atazanavir/ritonavir had less elevation in total cholesterol, non-HDL ("bad")
cholesterol and triglycerides regardless of ethnicity.
The percent
increase in total cholesterol from baseline to week 48 was 19% for blacks and
Asians receiving lopinavir/ritonavir, compared with 3% and 6%, respectively, for
those receiving atazanavir/ritonavir.
In the lopinavir/ritonavir
group, whites had a 27% increase in total cholesterol and patients in the other
racial/ethnic groups had a 30% increase, compared with increases of 15% and 17%,
respectively, for whites and other racial/ethnic groups receiving atazanavir/ritonavir.
The most notable
racial/ethnic trends in the data were an increase in triglycerides from baseline
to week 48 in the lopinavir/ritonavir group, noted as a 100% increase in Asians
and 60% increases in whites and other racial/ethnic groups.
In contrast,
triglyceride levels increased by 17% in whites, 0% in blacks, 21% in Asians, and
11% in the other racial/ethnic groups receiving atazanavir/ritonavir.
In
conclusion, the study investigators noted:
Both once-daily
atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir regimens produced overall
high levels of virological response and robust increases in CD4 cell count, but
the regimens varied in efficacy and immunological response by race/ethnicity.
In the primary
analysis, once-daily boosted atazanavir was non-inferior to twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir.
As expected,
direct hyperbilirubinemia occurred more frequently with atazanavir/ritonavir than
with lopinavir/ritonavir, but was not treatment-limiting.
The rates of
direct hyperbilirubinemia (all grades and grade 3-4) were slightly higher among
whites than other racial/ethnic groups, but were consistent with prior studies
of atazanavir/ritonavir.
While both
atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir regimens show high levels of efficacy
in all racial/ethnic groups at 48 weeks, variations in safety profiles -- particularly
GI tolerability and increases in lipid parameters -- discriminated between the
2 boosted PIs.
These differences
provide important information for clinicians to consider when selecting regimens
intended for long-term control of HIV infection.
8/12/08
Sources D
McGrath, J Uy, R Yang, and others. Efficacy
and Safety by Racial Group in ARV-naïve Subjects Treated with Atazanavir/ritonavir
or Lopinavir/ritonavir: 48-week Results of the CASTLE Study. XVII International
AIDS Conference (AIDS 2008). Mexico City. August 3-8, 2008. Poster TUPE0058.
Abbott
Laboratories. Abbott's Kaletra Tablet Dosed Once-Daily or Twice-Daily Demonstrated
Similar Clinical Results across Race and Gender Lines. Press Release. August
5, 2008. 
|