A
Comparison of the Single-dose Bioavailability of a Ritonavir Tablet Formulation
Compared with the Current Soft Gel Capsule
Ritonavir
(Norvir) has been approved by regulatory agencies worldwide and is indicated
for use in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment
of HIV infection. Due to its cytochrome P450 inhibition properties, ritonavir
dosed 100 mg once-daily (QD) to 200 mg twice-daily (BID) is frequently used as
a pharmacokinetic enhancer of other antiretrovirals,
including protease inhibitors. A
tablet formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir
(Kaletra) recently has been approved in many countries worldwide. This tablet
does not require refrigeration. In the current Phase I, open-label, randomized,
crossover study, presented at the XVII International AIDS
conference last week in Mexico City (August 3-8, 2008), researchers assessed
the bioavailability of the currently marketed soft gelatin capsule (SGC) compared
to a new tablet formulation with potentially improved stability compared to prior
pilot tablet formulations. A
total of 24 healthy HIV negative volunteers enrolled in this 2-period, single
dose study received a 100 mg dose of ritonavir test tablet or the currently marketed
SGC following a meal with moderate fat content. Serial blood samples were collected
for 36 hours after dosing in each period. The
pharmacokinetic parameters of ritonavir were assessed using area under the plasma
concentration time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Along
with its safety, the bioavailability of the tablet formulation relative to the
SGC was determined by the 2 1-sided test procedures via 90% confidence intervals.
Results
Ritonavir AUC
and Cmax were approximately 12% and 21% higher, respectively, after administration
of the ritonavir tablets compared with the SGC.
The point estimates
for ritonavir AUC was 20% higher and Cmax was 35% higher after administration
of the tablet compared to the SGC.
Both regimens
were generally safe and well tolerated.
The increase
in ritonavir exposure with the lopinavir/ritonavir tablet is not associated with
a change in safety or tolerability compared with the SGC.
In
conclusion, the study investigators concluded, "Ritonavir AUC after administration
of the tablet was bioequivalent to the currently marketed SGC. The ritonavir Cmax
upper bound of the 90% confidence interval exceed 1.25, which may be due, in part,
to more efficient absorption of the tablet formulations." In
addition, they noted, "The higher Cmax of ritonavir tablet is unlikely to
impact the safety profile or pharmacokinetic enhancing profile compared to the
ritonavir SGC." Abbott
Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL. 8/12/08 Reference
J Ng, CE Klein,
SJ Causemaker, and others. A Comparison of the Single Dose Bioavailability of
a Ritonavir Tablet Formulation Relative to the Ritonavir Soft Gel Capsule in Healthy
volunteers. XVII International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2008). Mexico City. August
3-8, 2008. Poster TUPE0076. 
|