| Overview
of the Current Standard of Care for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C The
current standard of care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)
infection is combination therapy with pegylated
interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) or pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PegIntron), both
in combination with ribavirin.
At the 13th
International Symposium on Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease (ISVHLD) last
week in Washington, DC, experts in the field of viral hepatitis were invited to
present their views on various issues. Dr. Peter Ferenci of the Department of
Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology at the Medical University of
Vienna, Austria, offered an overview of the use of the 2 pegylated interferons
plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C. Following is an edited summary of his
remarks.
Current
Therapies in Chronic Hepatitis C Peginterferon-alfa
in combination with ribavirin is and will remain for the next [few] years the
current standard for treatment of chronic hepatitis C (1).
The primary
goal of treatment for chronic hepatitis C is a sustained
virologic response (SVR). Host factors including age, body weight, race, and
advanced fibrosis influence
outcome of treatment (1,2), but are poor predictors of response. In contrast,
viral factors like the genotype and
the on-treatment pattern of viral response can be used to determine the likelihood
of treatment success and guide treatment duration individually and proved to be
very useful in clinical practice.
Stopping Treatment
in Likely Nonresponders
The absence of an early virologic response
[EVR] at week 12, defined as undetectable HCV RNA (< 50 IU/mL) by qualitative
PCR assay, or greater than or equal to 2-log decrease relative to the baseline
value by a quantitative PCR assay, has a 98% negative predictive value in a genotype
1 patient (3).
On this basis, treatment may be discontinued in patients
who do not achieve an early virologic response at week 12. Therapy should be stopped
in all patients with a > 2-log decrease in HCV RNA at week 12 who have not
become HCV RNA negative by week 24. Recent studies show that this information
can be used to individualize the duration of therapy.
The HCV RNA status
at week 4 also provides useful prognostic information that can be used to individualize
the duration of therapy in genotype 1 patients (4,5). Normalization of ALT on
treatment is an indicator of a therapeutic response but lacks specificity, and,
thus cannot be used in place of serum HCV RNA determinations.
Individualization
of Treatment
Genotypes 1 and 4
Loss of
HCV RNA by week 4 of treatment documented with a commercial qualitative HCV RNA
assay with a limit of detection of 50 IU/mL is an excellent predictor of sustained
virologic response in patients with genotype 1 infection (3). When treated for
48 weeks with peginterferon plus ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day, 87% to 91% of
such patients will have a sustained virologic response (3,6).
Around 24%
of European genotype 1 patients achieve an RVR [rapid virological response] (6).The
level of detection of HCV has been improved by the real time PCR technique to
10 IU/mL. The impact of using more sensitive tests remains to be studied.
Shortening
Treatment Duration: The
retrospective analysis of several randomized controlled trials using peginterferon-2/ribavirin
have shown that the probability of achieving a sustained virologic response is
similar in genotype 1 patients with rapid virologic response (RVR) treated for
24 or 48 weeks (4).
The concept of treatment shortening was addressed
by prospective trials, showing that > 80% of patients with genotype 1 and 4
achieve a SVR when treated only for 24 weeks (6). Thus, it is reasonable to consider
reducing the duration of combination therapy to 24 weeks in genotype 1-infected
with RVR when treated with a standard peginterferon plus ribavirin regimen.
Both
peginterferons have been approved in the European Union for shortened treatment
duration of 24 weeks in HCV genotype 1 patients with RVR and low baseline viral
load defined as <800.000 IU/ml for peginterferon alfa-2a and <600.000 IU/ml
for peginterferon alfa-2b. Abbreviated therapy may not be suitable in genotype
1 patients with cirrhosis.
Extending
Treatment Duration: In
patients with a slow [or partial] virologic response (pEVR), prolongation of treatment
beyond 48 weeks may reduce relapse rates and thus increase SVR. Several studies
investigated treatment prolongation in slow responders. Although they substantially
differed in design each one has shown that extending therapy to 72 weeks increases
the probability of achieving a sustained virologic response (5,7,8). There are
no data on which to base a universal recommendation to treat a patient such as
this for 72 weeks. In a recent study it was suggested that patients with detectable
HCV at week 8 will benefit from extended treatment (5).
Genotypes
2 and 3
Patients with genotypes
2 and 3 are easier to treat than patients with genotypes 1 and 4. Peginterferon
in combination with [ribavirin] 800 mg/day is sufficient. A number of studies
have demonstrated comparable SVR rates between shortened (12 to 16 weeks) and
24 weeks of treatment in patients who achieve a RVR.
However, in a large
randomized prospective study, among patients with an RVR, SVR rates were higher
in the 24-week treatment group than in the 16-week group -- both overall and within
each genotype group (9). The difference in SVR rate reflects a higher relapse
rate in the 16-week group (31%) compared with the 24-week group (18%).
Like
in patients with other genotypes, the presence of complete cirrhosis and a high
baseline HCV RNA level are poor prognostic factors for sustained virologic response
(2). Therefore abbreviation of treatment should only be offered to non-cirrhotic
patients with low baseline viral load. Prolongation of treatment in patients with
cirrhosis and in patients without RVR may improve the overall outcome and is currently
[being] investigated by a prospective randomized trial.
4/03/09
Reference
CP
Ferenci. Current Therapies in Hepatitis C. 13th International Symposium on Viral
Hepatitis and Liver Disease (ISVHLD). Washington, DC. May 20-24, 2009. Abstract
SP-29.
Other Citations
1. Dienstag JL, McHutchison JG. American
Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of hepatitis
C. Gastroenterology 2006;130:231-264
2. Missiha SB, Ostrowski M,
Heathcote EJ. Disease progression in chronic hepatitis C: modifiable and nonmodifiable
factors. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:1699-1714.
3. Ferenci P, Fried
MW, Shiffman ML et al. Predicting sustained virological responses in chronic hepatitis
C patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD)/ribavirin. Journal of
Hepatology 2005; 43:425-433.
4. Jensen DM, Morgan TR, Marcellin P et
al. Early identification of HCV genotype 1 patients responding to 24 weeks peginterferon
alpha-2a (40 kd)/ribavirin therapy. Hepatology 2006; 43:954-960.
5.
Sanchez-Tapias JM, Diago M, Escartin P et al. Peginterferon-alfa2a plus ribavirin
for 48 versus 72 weeks in patients with detectable hepatitis C virus RNA at week
4 of treatment. Gastroenterology 2006;131:451-460
6. Ferenci P,
Laferl ,H, Scherzer TM, Gschwantler M, Andreas Maieron A, Brunner H, et al. Peginterferon
alfa-2a and ribavirin for 24 weeks in hepatitis C type 1 and 4 patients with rapid
virological response. Gastroenterology 2008;135:451-458.
7. Berg
T et al. Extended treatment duration for hepatitis C virus type 1: comparing 48
versus 72 weeks of peginterferon-alfa-2a plus ribavirin. Gastroenterology
2006;130:1086?1097
8. Pearlman BL et al. Treatment extension to 72 weeks
of peginterferon and ribavirin in hepatitis C genotype 1-infected slow responders.
Hepatology 2007;46:1688?1694
9. Shiffman ML, Suter F, Bacon BR et
al. Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 16 or 24 weeks in HCV genotype 2 or
3. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357:124-134.
|