Merck
and HVTN Halt Trials of HIV Vaccine Candidate V520 Due to Disappointing Preliminary
Results
By
Liz Highleyman Last
Friday, September 21, Merck and the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious
Disease Health HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) announced that they were discontinuing
development of the HIV vaccine candidate V520, also known as MRKAd5, due to study
data showing that it did not lower the risk of infection or disease progression. Among
the several HIV vaccine candidates under development, some are preventive vaccines
intended to keep people from becoming infected with the virus, while others are
therapeutic vaccines designed to stimulate the body's immune response to the virus
and lessen disease progression in people after they become infected. V520,
a trivalent vaccine containing three recombinant HIV genes carried by an adenovirus
vector, was being studied as both a preventive and a therapeutic candidate, and
it was one of the furthest along in clinical trials. The international STEP study,
begun in 2004, enrolled 3000 HIV negative individuals who were considered at high
risk for infection, including gay men in San Francisco and female sex workers.
A review of
preliminary data from the Phase II trial led the study's Data Safety and Monitoring
Board (DSMB) to recommend that the trial not proceed due to lack of efficacy.
After about 1 year of follow-up, volunteers who received 1 dose of V520 did not
appear to be at less risk of infection than those who received a placebo injection.
In both arms, about 3% became infected, and response rates did not improve significantly
among those who received a second booster injection in what was intended to be
a 3-shot series. V520
also did not appear to promote stronger immune responses in people who were newly
infected, since viral load rose to comparable levels among those who received
the active vaccine and the placebo. The disappointing data were unexpected, since
V520 appeared to stimulate a robust immune response against HIV in earlier studies.
Although no
new subjects will be vaccinated, researchers plan to continue follow-up of participants
already enrolled in the STEP study. Another V520 trial in South African, known
as Phambili, is on hold while the DSMB reviews early data. Below
are excerpts from announcements from HVTN and Merck concerning the recent developments:
NIAID
Statement: Immunizations Are Discontinued in Two HIV Vaccine Trials
An
independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) met this week to review interim
data from a large, international HIV vaccine clinical trial known as the STEP
study - also referred to as the HVTN 502 or Merck V520-023 study. The clinical
trial, which began enrolling volunteers in December 2004, is co-sponsored by the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), and the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. Inc.,
which also developed and supplied the candidate vaccine. Based on a review of
interim data, the DSMB concluded that the vaccine cannot be shown in this trial
to prevent HIV infection or affect the course of the disease in those who become
infected with HIV as a result of their own behaviors that expose them to the virus.
Therefore, Merck and NIAID instructed all study sites to cease administering the
investigational vaccine but continue scheduled follow-up visits with all volunteers
until the data can be more thoroughly evaluated and a course of action is developed.
The
STEP study, which enrolled 3,000 participants, was conducted by the NIAID-funded
HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) and Merck. Volunteers were enrolled at sites
in Australia, Brazil, Canada, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Peru, Puerto
Rico, and the United States. The Phase IIb "test-of-concept" study was
designed to test Merck's candidate HIV vaccine, the MRKAd5 trivalent vaccine,
which aimed to stimulate production of immune system T cells that can kill HIV-infected
cells. The goal of the study was to determine if the vaccine could prevent HIV
infection, reduce the amount of HIV in those who do become infected, or both.
Based
on its first evaluation of interim efficacy data, the DSMB found 24 cases of HIV
infection among the 741 volunteers who received at least one dose of the investigational
vaccine compared with 21 cases of HIV infection among the 762 volunteers who were
vaccinated with placebo. In volunteers who received at least two vaccinations,
the DSMB found 19 cases of HIV infection among the 672 volunteers who received
the investigational vaccine and 11 instances of HIV infection among the 691 volunteers
who received the placebo. The trial partners will fully evaluate the trial data,
provide additional instructions to the STEP trial sites, and provide a detailed
scientific analysis of the study results in the near future.
The same Merck
candidate HIV vaccine is also being tested in South Africa by the HVTN and the
South African AIDS Vaccine Initiative in a separate NIAID-sponsored clinical trial
known as HVTN 503 or the "Phambili" study. This study was initiated
in February 2007 and has enrolled 799 individuals. Immunizations and enrollment
in the Phambili study have now been paused. This allows the independent DSMB that
oversees the Phambili trial to review all available HVTN 503 and STEP interim
findings to determine next steps. In contrast to the STEP study where the interim
analysis was almost exclusively based on results in volunteers who were men who
have sex with men, the Phambili study has primarily enrolled heterosexuals at
high risk for HIV.
The study investigators at each site for both the STEP
(HVTN 502/ Merck V520-023) and Phambili (HVTN 503) vaccine trials have been informed
of the decision to cease immunizations and are contacting study volunteers to
inform them of the developments.
For additional information about the HVTN
502 and HVTN 503 trials, see http://www3.niaid.nih.gov/news/QA/step_qa.htm.
Merck
Statement: Vaccination and Enrollment Are Discontinued in Phase II Trials of Merck's
Investigational HIV Vaccine Candidate
Interim
Analysis of STEP Study Shows Vaccine was not Effective
WHITEHOUSE STATION,
N.J., and Seattle, Sept. 21, 2007 - Vaccination in a phase II clinical trial of
Merck & Co., Inc.'s investigational HIV vaccine (V520) is being discontinued
because the vaccine was not effective. The announcement was made today by the
co-sponsors of this clinical trial, Merck & Co., Inc., and the HIV Vaccine
Trials Network (HVTN), which is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
The
trial, called STEP, was an international phase II "test of concept"
trial in uninfected volunteers at high risk for acquiring HIV infection. The independent
Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for STEP reviewed safety data and results
of an interim efficacy analysis of the study, and recommended that vaccination
be discontinued because the STEP trial will not meet its efficacy endpoints. Study
investigators have been instructed to discontinue vaccinating volunteers in this
study and to monitor them in accordance with the study protocol. Enrollment and
vaccination in a second Phase II trial of this vaccine being conducted by the
HVTN in South Africa called Phambili, and two additional Phase I trials, have
been discontinued. The DSMB for the Phambili trial will evaluate the available
data.
The Merck vaccine candidate is a mixture of three components, each
made with a weakened version of a common virus (adenovirus type 5), that serves
as a carrier, or delivery vector, along with three synthetically produced HIV
genes known as gag, pol and nef.
The STEP study (HVTN 502, Merck V520 Protocol
023) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II
test-of-concept clinical trial. The trial enrolled 3,000 HIV-negative volunteers
from diverse backgrounds between 18 and 45 years of age at high risk of HIV infection.
The
study evaluated two primary efficacy endpoints: whether the vaccine prevented
HIV infection and whether the vaccine reduced the amount of virus in those who
developed infection. As planned, an interim efficacy analysis was conducted in
the approximately 1,500 volunteers expected to have the best response to the vaccine
because they had low levels of pre-existing immunity to adenovirus 5.
The
vaccine did not prevent infection: in volunteers who received at least one dose
of the three-dose vaccine series, 24 cases of HIV infection were observed in the
741 volunteers who received vaccine and 21 cases of HIV infection were observed
in the 762 participants in the placebo group. In the subgroup who had received
at least two vaccinations and who were HIV negative for at least the first 12
weeks of the trial, 19 cases of HIV infection were observed in the 672 volunteers
who received vaccine and 11 cases were observed in the 691 volunteers who received
placebo. In addition, the vaccine did not reduce the amount of virus in the bloodstream
of those who became infected; HIV RNA levels approximately 8 to 12 weeks after
diagnosis of infection were similar in the vaccine and the placebo arms. The geometric
means of the HIV RNA levels in the blood of infected individuals, the standard
measure of ongoing HIV replication, were approximately 40,000 copies/mL in the
vaccine group and approximately 37,000 copies/mL in the placebo group. Additional
analyses will be conducted on the entire study population and will be shared with
the scientific community.
Study volunteers were followed for approximately
13 months. Overall adverse event rates were generally similar among the two groups,
except for a higher rate of local injection-site related reactions in the vaccine
group.
"We share in the disappointment of the research and HIV communities
today. Sadly, developing an effective AIDS vaccine remains one of the most challenging
tasks facing modern medicine," said Peter S. Kim, PhD, president, Merck Research
Laboratories. "Merck's 20-year HIV research program has led to improved scientific
understanding of HIV and to true breakthrough medicines. We are committed to studying
the data closely and sharing it with the scientific community to inform the on-going
search for an effective HIV vaccine."
"HVTN is a global network
of scientists, staff and community members whose mission is to speed the rapid
development of a safe and effective preventative HIV vaccine," said Larry
Corey, M.D., principal investigator of the HVTN. "This trial was the first
test of concept trial that provided us information on this vaccine more quickly
and efficiently than with a traditional Phase III design.
While we are
very disappointed that this vaccine candidate did not demonstrate protection,
the data from this trial will provide critical insights into this disease and
future vaccine development."
"This is a huge disappointment for
all of us who have been involved in the search for an HIV vaccine," said
Glenda Gray, MD, principal investigator of the HVTN sponsored Phambili trial.
"HIV is ravaging our communities, and all the scientists, participants and
communities involved in HIV vaccine studies have been affected by this epidemic.
The scientific community must continue the race to find a vaccine to help secure
an HIV free generation for the future."
The Merck adenovirus-based
vaccine used a cell-mediated immune response approach; it was hypothesized that
the HIV genes in the vaccine would stimulate the body to generate an HIV-specific
immune response through the body's own CD8 T-cells, which become programmed to
recognize and kill HIV infected cells.
Adenoviruses are among the causes
of common cold; the type 5 adenovirus used in this investigational vaccine had
been modified so that it was unable to replicate and could not cause a cold. Also,
because the vaccine did not contain live HIV and contained only three HIV genes,
volunteers could not become infected with HIV from the vaccination. This vaccine
had previously been tested in several smaller clinical trials and was found to
be generally well tolerated and capable of inducing significant levels of HIV-specific
cell-mediated immune responses.
STEP included multiple clinical trial sites
in North and South America, the Caribbean and Australia, where HIV subtype B,
the subtype of HIV from which the HIV genes included in the vaccine, is predominant.
Half the study participants received three doses of the vaccine over six months,
while the other half were given three doses of a placebo. The first volunteer
enrolled in the study in December 2004, and enrollment was completed in March
2007.
The second phase II trial of this vaccine candidate, the Phambili
trial, (HVTN 503, Merck V520 Protocol 026) was begun in 2007 in South Africa by
the HVTN to explore whether Merck's vaccine would be effective at preventing infection,
reducing viral levels, or both, from HIV subtype C, which is more common in southern
Africa.
09/25/09
Sources
NIAID. Immunizations Are
Discontinued in Two HIV Vaccine Trials. Press release. September 21, 2007.
Merck
& Co. Vaccination and Enrollment Are Discontinued in Phase II Trials of Merck's
Investigational HIV Vaccine Candidate. Press release. September 21, 2007.
|