HOME
HIV and AIDS
Hepatitis B
Hepatitis C
HIV-HCV Coinfection
HIV-HBV Coinfection
HIV and AIDS Articles on:
  FDA-approved Treatments
 
Experimental Treatments
 
Top New Articles
HOME PAGE

FDA and European Medicines Agency Will Consider New Biomarker Test Results When Assessing Kidney Toxicity of Experimental Drugs

In the first use of a framework allowing submission of a single application to the 2 agencies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) will allow drug companies to submit the results of 7 new tests that evaluate kidney toxicity during animal studies of new drugs, according to a recent FDA news release.

The tests measure levels of 7 key biomarker proteins found in urine that can provide information about drug-induced damage to kidney cells (renal toxicity). The new biomarkers are:

KIM-1;
Albumin;
Total protein;
Beta-2 microglobulin;
Cystatin C;
Clusterin;
Trefoil factor-3.

For decades, both the FDA and EMEA have required drug companies to submit the results of 2 blood tests -- blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine -- to evaluate renal toxicity.

In addition to these tests, the FDA and EMEA will now consider results from the 7 new tests as part of their respective drug review processes. Although a decision by the sponsor to collect information using the new tests is voluntary, it must be submitted to FDA if collected.

"The development of these and other biomarkers can result in important tools for better understanding the safety profile of new drugs," said Janet Woodcock, MD, director of FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. "We hope these biomarkers will lead to human tests that detect drug-induced kidney injury in people earlier than is now possible, and help health care professionals better manage potential kidney damage from drugs."

Woodcock added that such human tests could one day open the door to the approval of more powerful drugs, especially for diseases in which renal toxicity currently prevents approval of promising experimental drugs. With more sensitive tests, the FDA could potentially approve such drugs because healthcare professionals could more closely monitor patients and halt a drug if there are early signs of renal toxicity.

Development of the new biomarkers was led by the Predictive Safety Testing Consortium (PSTC), which includes scientists from 16 pharmaceutical companies. The PSTC was organized and led by the Critical Path Institute, a nonprofit organization that works to support FDA research collaborations that improve the development of medical products.

Researchers from Merck & Co. (Whitehouse Station, NJ) and Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) identified the new biomarkers, tested them to prove their accuracy and usefulness, and shared their findings with the other consortium members for further study. The consortium then submitted applications for use of the biomarkers to the FDA and EMEA.

The project is the first in which a group of drug companies has worked together to propose and qualify new safety tests and then present them jointly to the FDA and EMEA for consideration. The FDA and EMEA laid the groundwork for these specific biomarker reviews in 2004 when they developed a framework called the Voluntary Exploratory Data Submission review process.

The new process allowed the PSTC to submit a single biomarker data application to both regulatory agencies, and then to meet jointly with scientists from both agencies to discuss it in detail and to address additional scientific questions posed by the regulators. Each regulatory agency then reviewed the application separately and made independent decisions on use of the new biomarkers.

FDA scientists believe that the 7 new tests may provide important advantages over the BUN and creatinine tests. For example, in rat experiments, the 2 traditional tests can only detect kidney damage a week after it has begun to occur. The new tests, however, are more sensitive and can detect cellular damage within hours. While BUN and serum creatinine show that damage has occurred somewhere in the kidneys, the new tests can pinpoint which parts of the kidney have been affected.

The 7 new tests were developed and will be used initially in rats. These tests were selected because other studies have shown that identical biomarkers are produced in human kidney cells. The PSTC has begun work to further qualify the biomarkers for use in human studies, and if successful will present a new biomarker data application to the FDA and EMEA.

Predictive Safety Testing Consortium

6/17/08

Source
Food and Drug Administration. FDA, European Medicines Agency to Consider Additional Test Results When Assessing New Drug Safety. FDA News. June 12, 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Protease Inhibitors
Agenerase (amprenavir)
Aptivus (tipranavir)
Crixivan (indinavir)
Invirase (saquinavir hard gel)
Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir)
Lexiva (fosamprenavir)
Norvir (ritonavir)
Prezista (darunavir)
Reyataz (atazanavir)
Viracept (nelfinavir)
Nucleoside / Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Combivir (zidovudine/lamivudine)
Epivir (lamivudine; 3TC)
Emtriva (emtricitabine; FTC)
Epzicom (abacavir + lamivudine)
Retrovir (zidovudine; AZT)
Trizivir (abacavir + zidovudine +lamivudine)
Truvada  (tenofovir / emtricitabine)
Videx (didanosine; ddI)
Viread (tenofovir)
Zerit (stavudine; d4T)
Ziagen (abacavir)
non Nucleoside Reverse
Transcriptase Inhibitors
Etravirine (Intelence; TMC125)
Rescriptor (delavirdine)
Sustiva (efavirenz)
Viramune (nevirapine)
Entry Inhibitors
(including Fusion Inhibitors)
Fuzeon (enfuvirtide, T-20)
Selzentry ( maraviroc)
Fixed-dose Combinations
Atripla (efavirenz + emtricitabine + tenofovir)
Combivir (zidovudine + lamivudine)
Trizivir (abacavir + zidovudine + lamivudine)
Truvada (tenofovir + emtricitabine)
Integrase Inhibitor
Isentress (raltegravir)