Fosamprenavir
(Lexiva) Works Well with 100 mg Ritonavir (Norvir) at 96 Weeks in Treatment-naive
Patients By
Liz Highleyman The
use of ritonavir (Norvir) to boost
blood levels of other protease inhibitors
has improved the effectiveness and convenience of combination
antiretroviral therapy, but ritonavir can cause metabolic side effects and
adds to the number of pills a patient must take. According
to a study reported in the April 2009 issue of AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
(available in advance online), once-daily fosamprenavir
(Lexiva) boosted with 100 mg ritonavir worked at least as well as a 200 mg
boosting dose at 96 weeks in HIV patients starting treatment for the first time.
(Results
were previously presented at the 48th International Conference on Antimicrobial
Agents and Chemotherapy [ICAAC] in October 2008, abstract H-1246). As
per the current prescribing information, the approved dose for treatment-naive
adults is 1400 mg fosamprenavir plus either 100 mg or 200 mg ritonavir once-daily,
or else 700 mg fosamprenavir plus 100 mg ritonavir twice-daily. Only the twice-daily
dose is recommended for treatment-experienced patients. In
this open-label multicenter trial, investigators with the COL 100758 Study Team
compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily fosamprenavir with 100 mg or 200
mg ritonavir. A
total of 115 treatment-naive participants with HIV viral load > 1000
copies/mL took 1400 mg once-daily fosamprenavir and were randomly assigned (1:1)
to receive one of the 2 ritonavir boosting doses; everyone also received 600 mg/300
mg abacavir/lamivudine. Most
study participants (about 80%) were men, about half were African-American, and
about 40% were white. At baseline, participants in both arms had similar viral
loads (median 4.7-4.9 log10 copies/mL), but those in the 100 mg ritonavir arm
had a somewhat higher CD4 count (259 vs 179 cells/mm3). The
primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving a viral load < 400
copies/mL or discontinuing therapy for drug-related reasons at 48 weeks. Secondary
endpoints were HIV RNA < 400 copies/mL at 24 and 96 weeks, and < 50 copies/mL
at 24, 48, and 96 weeks. Results
In an intent-to-treat missing = failure analysis at 96 weeks, significantly more
patients in the 100 mg ritonavir arm had viral load < 400 copies/mL compared
with the 200 mg ritonavir arm (78% vs 53%; P = 0.006).
For viral load < 50 copies/mL, the correspondence proportions were 66% vs 53%,
respectively, which was not a statistically significant difference.
In an observed or as-treated analysis of 79 patients who completed 96 weeks, 98%
in the 100 mg ritonavir arm and 94% in the 200 mg arm achieved HIV RNA < 400
copies/mL (not a significant difference).
For viral load < 50 copies/mL, the correspondence percentages were 83% and
94%, respectively (again, not significantly different).
The 100 mg and 200 mg ritonavir arms had a similar median change from baseline
in CD4 count, 265 vs 260 cells/mm3.
Fewer patients receiving 100 mg ritonavir experienced virological failure (5 vs
8), and none developed major protease inhibitor resistance mutations.
Fewer participants in the 100 mg ritonavir arm discontinued treatment prematurely
(12 vs 24 patients).
Overall, the types and frequencies of treatment-related moderate to severe (grade
2-4) adverse event were similar in the 2 treatment arms.
The most commonly reported grade 2-4 adverse events were diarrhea, headache, suspected
abacavir hypersensitivity reaction, nausea, abdominal pain, fatigue, and rash.
Increases in total cholesterol levels (33 vs 35 mg/dL) and total cholesterol to
HDL ratios (4.0 vs 4.1) were essentially the same in the 100 mg and 200 mg ritonavir
arms.
The 100 mg ritonavir group, however, experienced a smaller increase in triglyceride
levels (27 vs 48 mg/dL).
Based
on these findings, the researchers concluded, "through 96 weeks, [fosamprenavir/100
mg ritonavir] was more effective and prompted less elevation in triglycerides
than [fosamprenavir/200 mg ritonavir]." "This
data further supports the use of this simplified regimen in clinical practice
for treatment-naive HIV patients," said Judith Ng-Cashin, MD, Vice President,
Clinical Therapeutic Area, GlaxoSmithKline (manufacturer of fosamprenavir) in
a press release issued by the company. "This regimen not only reduces the
pill burden for patients therefore reducing costs, but may also enhance treatment
adherence among patients." Duke University, Durham, NC; Orlando
Immunology Center, Orlando, FL; Texas ID Consultants, Dallas, TX; University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle
Park, NC. 4/03/09 Reference CB
Hicks, E Dejesus, LM Sloan, and others. Comparison of Once-Daily Fosamprenavir
Boosted with Either 100 or 200 mg of Ritonavir, in Combination with Abacavir/Lamivudine:
96-Week Results from COL100758. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 25(4). April
2009 (Epub ahead of print). (Abstract).
Other
Source GlaxoSmithKline. Data Support Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of a
Lower Dose of Ritonavir-Boosted LEXIVA in Treatment-Naive HIV Patients. Media
announcement. March 30, 2009.
|