|
Medication
Adherence Is More Critical Than Initial CD4 Count in Predicting
HIV Survival
Adherence
to an antiretroviral regimen is more important than the CD4 cell
count at which antiretroviral therapy is begun in determining the
survival with HIV, according to a report in the November 18th Annals
of Internal Medicine.
Several
studies have suggested that delaying the initiation of highly active
antiretroviral therapy (HAART) after the CD4 cell count falls below
350 cells/microliter is unsafe, the authors explain, but the optimal
time to initiate HAART remains uncertain.
Dr.
Julio S.G. Montaner and colleagues from University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada evaluated the effect of baseline
CD4 cell count and adherence on survival rates after the initiation
of HAART in 1422 HIV-infected patients.
Among
patients with a baseline CD4 cell count of at least 200 cells/microliter,
the crude mortality rate was twice as high among those who were
less than 75% adherent (15.2%) than among those who were at least
75% adherent (7.1%), the authors report.
Mortality
rates associated with nonadherence were increased 2.5-fold even
among patients whose baseline CD4 cell counts were 350 cells/microliter
or greater, the results indicate.
In
Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, patients with baseline CD4 cell
counts of at least 200 cells/microliter fared as well as patients
with higher baseline CD4 cell counts as long as they were at least
75% adherent.
Results
were similar when 95% adherence was used to stratify the patients,
the report indicates, and censoring accidental causes of death from
the analysis did not influence the conclusions.
"These
data suggest that patient nonadherence, instead of when antiretroviral
therapy is initiated before a CD4+ cell count of 200 cells/microliter,
may be the strongest determinant of patient survival," the
authors conclude. "These results should be useful for patients
weighing the difficult decision about the optimal time to initiate
HAART and for the ongoing development of therapeutic guidelines."
11/21/03
Ann
Intern Med 2003;139:810-816.
|