Treatment with Pioglitazone But Not  with Fenofibrate Improves HAART-related Metabolic Syndrome

Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial show that administration of pioglitazone, but not fenofibrate, improved insulin resistance, blood pressure, and lipid profile over a 12-month period in patients with HAART-induced metabolic syndrome. The study results appear in the March 1, 2005 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Background

HAART leads to profound and sustained suppression of HIV-1 replication, but it also results in the development of a metabolic syndrome, which confers an increased risk for developing premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Pioglitazone, 1 of the 2 thiazolidinediones that are currently available, improves insulin resistance and has a more favorable effect on lipid profile than does rosiglitazone in non–HIV-infected patients with diabetes.

Although a few studies on the role of rosiglitazone in HAART-induced metabolic syndrome have been published , no randomized, placebo-controlled studies of the use of pioglitazone have been published. In addition, although open-label, uncontrolled studies have reported that fenofibrate, a fibric acid derivative, improves dyslipidemia and hyperglycemia in patients with HAART-induced metabolic syndrome , no randomized trials have been published to date.

Trial Design

Researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts designed a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of pioglitazone and fenofibrate administration for 1 year in patients who developed metabolic abnormalities after starting HAART.

14 subjects were randomized to receive treatment, 7 subjects received active pioglitazone and 7 received the corresponding placebo, whereas 6 subjects received active fenofibrate and 8 received the corresponding placebo. The study group included 13 men and 1 woman, with a mean age (±SD) of 48 ± 8.6 years.

Five subjects had mixed-fat redistribution, 5 subjects had fat accumulation, 3 subjects had fat wasting, and 1 subject did not have any fat redistribution; there was no significant difference in the number of subjects with the different types of fat redistribution among the treatment groups.

Six subjects received a diagnosis of diabetes, 1 had impaired fasting glucose levels, and 7 had insulin resistance at baseline; there was no significant difference in the distribution of subjects with these characteristics among the treatment groups.

Results

In contrast to the previous open-label study to evaluate pioglitazone therapy among 11 HIV-positive patients receiving HAART, the investigators found that, consistent with the effects seen in non-HIV-infected subjects with diabetes, pioglitazone improves insulin resistance and favorably affects the lipid profile by decreasing triglyceride levels and increasing HDL cholesterol levels.

In addition, although LDL cholesterol levels tended to increase, the LDL particle size tended to increase, too, which resulted in lower levels of atherogenic LDL cholesterol. In contrast, rosiglitazone increased cholesterol and triglyceride levels.

However, conflicting, yet limited, data exist on the effect of these 2 medications on the body composition of patients who are receiving antiretroviral therapy. We also report, for the first time, that, in agreement with data from rodent studies, pioglitazone treatment improved blood pressure in subjects with HAART-induced metabolic syndrome.

Conclusions

In conclusion, pioglitazone is efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of HAART-induced metabolic syndrome. Because pioglitazone has effects similar to those of rosiglitazone on insulin resistance and glucose metabolism, comparative studies of rosiglitazone are warranted to demonstrate whether pioglitazone has more beneficial effects on the lipid profile and hypertension.

This would justify the preferential use of pioglitazone for HIV-positive subjects who develop HAART-induced metabolic syndrome. Additional, larger studies to investigate the effect of fenofibrate in patients with higher triglyceride levels-possibly for each lipodystrophy subgroup separately—are also warranted, as are larger studies to investigate the role of treatment with pioglitazone in combination with fenofibrate.

02/14/05

Reference
A Gavrila and others. Improvement in Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy–Induced Metabolic Syndrome by Treatment with Pioglitazone but Not with Fenofibrate: A 2 × 2  Factorial, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases 40(5): 745-749. March 1, 2005.

Link to Index of All HIV and AIDS Articles by Topic